Re: Is BY-ND a good choice for an Internet ¡Hello! ¿How fare you? Firstly CC is a

	¡Hello!

	¿How fare you?

	Firstly CC is a jack of all trades, but master of none. 
Secondly,  
CC-BY-ND could make it impossible for anyone but your friend
to  
improve it.  This is what I would do:

	GPL it and if you want multilicense it under CC-BY-SA and
GFDL with  
no invariant sections too for good measure.  That would
ensure that  
other could build on it, if they make their changes freely
available  
s that others could freely implement them.  Here is more
specific  
information:

	*	-	<HTTP://WikiPedia.org/wiki/GPL>
	*	-	<HTTP://WikiPedia.Org/wiki/GFDL>

	Remember that the essential license is the GPL.  The others
are just  
nice extras to use too.

	¡Peace!

-- 

	"Ŭalabio‽" <WalabioMacOSX.Com>

	The first Intactivistic wiki on Earth devoted to Genital
Integrity:

	*	-	<HTTP://PeaceFulBeginnings.Org/>
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenseslists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses