Roger Chrisman wrote:
> "By posting content to WikiTeach, you are
granting a share-alike
> full copyleft license on that content. A copyleft
license uses
> copyright law in order to ensure that every person who
receives a copy
> or derived version of a work can use, modify, and also
redistribute
> both the work, and derived versions of the work. A full
copyleft
> license imposes the requirement that any freedom that
is granted
> regarding the original work or its copies, must be
granted on exactly
> the same terms in any derived work. This allows maximum
freedom for all
> users. Each lesson plan includes a copyleft statement
that must be
> included in all copies and resulting works. This
provides a mechanism
> to preserve the copyleft freedoms for subsequent users.
-in other
> words, you give the next person the right to copy or
change your
> content in any way-you are giving it away to the world
out of the
> goodness of your heart and it belongs to everyone and
no one."
>
> WikiTeach has no other legalese style license
statement, only the above.
IANAL, but ISTM that this is a policy statement for a
distribution of
separate content with media-compatible (but not necessarily
derivative-compatible) licensing.
IOW, it compares to the Debian Free Software Guidelines
which determine
whether a "package" can be included in Debian.
The implication would be that each item submitted would be
expected to
have its own license terms, but that only copyleft licenses
would be
accepted. Since the items are separate, their copylefts
aren't binding
on each other, so multiple copyleft licenses can co-exist on
the server.
However, it would, IMHO be smarter to have a more precise
policy. And I
haven't explored the site myself.
???
Cheers,
Terry
--
Terry Hancock (hancock AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpac
eworks.com
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
|