-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
drew Roberts wrote:
>> However, there's a lot of "bad blood"
between free software
>> advocates and the CC, which stems primarily from
CC's promotion of
>> "non-commercial" licenses,
>
> I am almost there myself, more because I have asked
here on the lists over and
> repeatedly for CC to consider the creation of a Free CC
logo/banner so that
> those of us who want to promote Free works can do so
without giving a tcit
> stamp of approval to no-free works or furthering
confusion between the two.
> there has never been a response. Even to point me to a
better place / way to
> make such a request. This does not go towards gaining /
maintaining my
> confidence in CC.
hey drew,
sorry for getting into this minor matter in the license
compatibility
thread, but hasn't the concern of conflation of different
licenses with
different degrees of freedom been addressed with the new CC
buttons that
indicate what license is being used? this really does
resolve the
well-founded critique that came from the free software
community.
tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF0QVPkbN024ZV0z0RAuPVAJ94oe71/wWYdFt/t18FcFSFfk8/RgCg
w1s7
TBD87Yk6sfoJKXByCZAJJjg=
=aloE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
|
