just share alike

Does anyone know if there is a license for share alike, not
requiring 
attribution?

I  have some artwork I want to license as such, and don't
want people to be 
forced to say I made it if they copy or modify a copy. I am
not even sure I 
want to force them to say what kind of license it has. I do
however want to 
restrict people from restricting the copying or modifying of
their copies or 
modified copies.

I have been trying to find such a license and could not find
one at creative 
commons. The closest one I found was a GPL kind, that was
primarily written 
for software, but I think also could appy to anything
considered a "work". 
That one still required stating the license though. Is there
any problem 
with taking an existing license, removing the title and
changing some of the 
words to make it more like what I want? Incase any of this
sounds uninformed 
it is because I have just begun researching this.

Thanks, Matt

____________________________________________________________
_____
Mortgage rates near historic lows. Refinance $200,000 loan
for as low as 
$771/month* 
https://w
ww2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&
amp;tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h27f8&disc=y&
amp;vers=689&s=4056&p=5117

_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenseslists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses

There is still the 1.0 CC-SA license:
http://cr
eativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/

I believe CC phased it out of their official repertoire
because
a) very few people did not ask for attribution
b) under moral rights jurisdictions, it's impossible to
relinquish
that right (see http://en.w
ikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_rights )

but that's only my memory of it.

On 4/26/07, matt draghi <mattdraghihotmail.com> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a license for share alike,
not requiring
> attribution?
>
> I  have some artwork I want to license as such, and
don't want people to be
> forced to say I made it if they copy or modify a copy.
I am not even sure I
> want to force them to say what kind of license it has.
I do however want to
> restrict people from restricting the copying or
modifying of their copies or
> modified copies.
>
> I have been trying to find such a license and could not
find one at creative
> commons. The closest one I found was a GPL kind, that
was primarily written
> for software, but I think also could appy to anything
considered a "work".
> That one still required stating the license though. Is
there any problem
> with taking an existing license, removing the title and
changing some of the
> words to make it more like what I want? Incase any of
this sounds uninformed
> it is because I have just begun researching this.
>
> Thanks, Matt
>
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
> Mortgage rates near historic lows. Refinance $200,000
loan for as low as
> $771/month*
> https://w
ww2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035&url=%2fst.jsp&
amp;tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h27f8&disc=y&
amp;vers=689&s=4056&p=5117
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-licenses mailing list
> cc-licenseslists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
>


-- 
Peace & Love,
Erik

DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official
position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.

"An old, rigid civilization is reluctantly dying.
Something new, open,
free and exciting is waking up." -- Ming the Mechanic
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenseslists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses

matt draghi wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is a license for share alike,
not requiring 
> attribution?
>
> I  have some artwork I want to license as such, and
don't want people to be 
> forced to say I made it if they copy or modify a copy.
I am not even sure I 
> want to force them to say what kind of license it has.
I do however want to 
> restrict people from restricting the copying or
modifying of their copies or 
> modified copies.
> 
> I have been trying to find such a license and could not
find one at creative 
> commons. The closest one I found was a GPL kind, that
was primarily written 
> for software, but I think also could appy to anything
considered a "work". 
> That one still required stating the license though. Is
there any problem 
> with taking an existing license, removing the title and
changing some of the 
> words to make it more like what I want? Incase any of
this sounds uninformed 
> it is because I have just begun researching this.

There was a plain ShareAlike license in version 1.0:

http://cr
eativecommons.org/licenses/sa/1.0/

That said, I would just recommend using the 3.0 BY-SA, and
stating
explicitly that you don't require any attribution.  The
attribution
clause is written in such a way that if you don't ask for a
credit, the
licensee isn't required to provide one.  They will, however,
still be
required to retain the CC notice and to license any
derivative works
using the same license.

James
_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenseslists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses