List Info

Thread: IKE resource exhaustion at 2 to 10 packets per second




IKE resource exhaustion at 2 to 10 packets per second
user name
2006-07-27 19:22:21
http://www.nta-monitor.com/posts/2006/07/cis
co-concentrator-dos.html

The vulnerability allows an attacker to exhaust the IKE
resources on a
remote VPN concentrator by starting new IKE sessions faster
than the
concentrator expires them from its queue. By doing this, the
attacker
fills up the concentrator's queue, which prevents it from
handling valid
IKE requests.

The exploit involves sending IKE Phase-1 packets containing
an
acceptable transform. It is not necessary to have valid
credentials in
order to exploit this vulnerability, as the problem occurs
before the
authentication stage. The vulnerability affects both Main
Mode and
Aggressive Mode, and both normal IKE over UDP and Cisco
proprietary
TCP-encapsulated IKE.

In order to exploit the vulnerability, the attacker needs to
send IKE
packets at a rate which exceeds the Concentrator's IKE
session expiry
rate. Tests show that the target concentrator starts to be
affected at a
rate of 2 packets per second, and is becomes unusable at 10
packets per
second. As a minimal Main Mode packet with a single
transform is 112
bytes long, 10 packets per second corresponds to a data rate
of slightly
less than 9,000 bits per second.

...

The vulnerability was first discovered on 4th July 2005, and
was reported
to Cisco's security team (PSIRT) the same day. Cisco
responded on 9th
August 2005, but no further progress has been made, over a
year after
finding the flaw.

====

Gosh and golly gee, how could this vulnerability slip past
them without
anybody noticing?

... other than the person posting an internet-draft that the
IESG refused
to publish as an RFC, that was instead published in ;login:
December 1999.

... that attack threat was mentioned in the design
principles of Photuris
circa 1995, that the IESG also refused to publish until
after the
NSA-originated and approved IKE/ISAKMP protocol.

It's particularly amusing that Photuris was overwhelmingly
approved in a
straw poll conducted by John Gilmore at the 36th IETF in
Montreal, 1996,
but Cisco issued a press release that they had chosen the
NSA-designed
protocol instead.  Protocol adoption by press release, such
a good choice.

They just had the 66th IETF in Montreal a week ago.  Full
circle.

Anybody ready to order Photuris from your vendors?




------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe
cryptography" to majordomometzdowd.com
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )