Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ben Laurie:
>
>> I don't use PGP - for email encryption I use
enigmail, and getting
>> missing keys is as hard as pressing the "get
missing keys" button.
>
> A step which has really profound privacy implications.
>
> I couldn't find a PGP key server operator that
committed itself to
> keeping logs confidential and deleting them in a timely
manner (but I
> didn't look very hard, either). Of course, since PGP
hasn't
> progressed as faster as our computing resources, I'm
nowadays in a
> position to run my own key server, but this is hardly a
solution to
> that kind of problem.
OK, I buy the problem, but until we do something about the
totally
non-anonymising properties of the 'net, revealing that I
want the public
key for some person seems to be quite minor - compared, for
example, to
revealing that I sent him email each time I do.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-
ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he
can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe
cryptography" to majordomo metzdowd.com
|