|
List Info
Thread: WEP cracked even worse
|
|
| WEP cracked even worse |
  United States |
2007-04-03 18:43:36 |
Not that WEP has been considered remotely secure for some
time, but
the best crack is now down to 40,000 packets for a 50%
chance of
cracking the key.
http://www.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/aircrack-ptw/
a>
--
Perry E. Metzger perry piermont.com
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomo metzdowd.com
|
|
| RE: WEP cracked even worse |
  United Kingdom |
2007-04-03 20:38:37 |
On 04 April 2007 00:44, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Not that WEP has been considered remotely secure for
some time, but
> the best crack is now down to 40,000 packets for a 50%
chance of
> cracking the key.
>
> http://www.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/aircrack-ptw/
a>
Sorry, is that actually better than "The final nail
in WEP's coffin", which
IIUIC can get the entire keystream (who needs the key?) in
log2(nbytes) packet
exchanges (to oversimplify a bit, but about right
order-of-magnitude)?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomo metzdowd.com
|
|
| Re: WEP cracked even worse |
  Germany |
2007-04-05 10:31:46 |
On Apr 4, 2007, at 03:38 , Dave Korn wrote:
> On 04 April 2007 00:44, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>> Not that WEP has been considered remotely secure
for some time, but
>> the best crack is now down to 40,000 packets for a
50% chance of
>> cracking the key.
>>
>> http://www.cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de/aircrack-ptw/
a>
>
>
> Sorry, is that actually better than "The final
nail in WEP's
> coffin", which
> IIUIC can get the entire keystream (who needs the key?)
in log2
> (nbytes) packet
> exchanges (to oversimplify a bit, but about right
order-of-magnitude)?
Hi Dave,
this of course is a question of how you value an attack: a
key
recovery usually is worth more than a decryption oracle.
To send arbitrary packets with the fragmentation attacks
described in
[1, Section 2.6], you need just a single (suitable) data
packet.
However, in order to decrypt packets, you need either 2
(connectivity
to other networks that you have a host on that you can
control, e.g
the internet) or approx. 2^7 packets (no access to outside
hosts)
_per byte_ that you want to decrypt. Our method surely pays
of if you
want to decrypt more than a handful of packets.
Cheers,
Ralf
[1] Andrea Bittau, Mark Handley, Joshua Lackey
The Final Nail in WEP’s Coffin
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2006,
http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/SP.2006.40
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomo metzdowd.com
|
|
[1-3]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|