List Info

Thread: Re: 0wned .gov machines (was Re: Russian cyberwar against Estonia?)




Re: 0wned .gov machines (was Re: Russian cyberwar against Estonia?)
country flaguser name
United States
2007-05-20 13:34:53
>I've heard nothing formal, but my strong understanding
is a lot of US
>government machines, at least if we're talking
workstations on
>non-classified nets, are in fact "0wn3d" at
this point.

Well, here's an anecdote: at last year's CEAS conference,
Rob Thomas
of Team Cymru gave the keynote on the underground economy,
with a most
horrifying set of both live demos and selected snapshots of
the online
bazaars where online warez are traded, everything from
zombie farms to
spamware to stolen credit cards.  One of the more amusing
was a guy
who offered a zombie in some part of the government that
you'd hope
would be moderately secure, NASA or someplace like that, at
a higher
than normal price.  The immediate response was ridicule,
bots on
government nets are a dime a dozen, and aren't worth any
more than any
other bot.

R's,
John

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

Re: 0wned .gov machines (was Re: Russian cyberwar against Estonia?)
country flaguser name
United States
2007-05-21 09:22:30
At 6:34 PM +0000 5/20/07, John Levine wrote:
>  >I've heard nothing formal, but my strong
understanding is a lot of US
>>government machines, at least if we're talking
workstations on
>>non-classified nets, are in fact "0wn3d"
at this point.
>
>Well, here's an anecdote: at last year's CEAS
conference, Rob Thomas
>of Team Cymru gave the keynote on the underground
economy, with a most
>horrifying set of both live demos and selected snapshots
of the online
>bazaars where online warez are traded, everything from
zombie farms to
>spamware to stolen credit cards.  One of the more
amusing was a guy
>who offered a zombie in some part of the government that
you'd hope
>would be moderately secure, NASA or someplace like that,
at a higher
>than normal price.  The immediate response was ridicule,
bots on
>government nets are a dime a dozen, and aren't worth any
more than any
>other bot.

Oh, goodie. I get to the same source to show the opposite.
At Rob's 
talk at the AOTA summit, he talked about someone offering
some botted 
machines in a particular US government subnet at a normal
prices and 
someone quickly over-bid by a suspiciously high amount. The

assumption is that it was for the possible data on those
machines.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )