List Info

Thread: unintended consequences?




unintended consequences?
country flaguser name
United States
2007-08-08 13:48:54
I recently saw a news story about a new kind of fiber optic
cable from
Corning -- it has a much smaller bending radius.  (See
http
://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/08/0
6/100141306/index.htm?postversion=2007072303
and
http://www.corning.com/media_center/press
_releases/2007/2007072301.aspx)
The problem is that when fiber is bent too sharply, the
light escapes.
Of course, that's the rumored way that, umm, agencies tap
fiber: they
bend it enough that some light escapes, but not too much. 
That trick
won't work nearly as well with the new fiber, which is
reportedly 100x
more bendable.  Does that mean that the new fiber is less
tappable?



		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbi
a.edu/~smb

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

Re: unintended consequences?
country flaguser name
United States
2007-08-08 16:41:52
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> Does that mean that the new fiber is less tappable?

No change, notwithstanding anecdotal references on fiber
bending
as used for tapping.

Tapping a fiber can be done without much notice by matching
the
index of refraction outside the outer fiber layer, after
abrasion
and etching to reach that layer. There is no need for
bending,
which might not be physically possible (eg, in a thick cable
bundle),
would increase propagation losses beyond that caused by the
tapped
signal power itself, and might create detectable backward
propagating waves (BPWs are monitored to detect fiber
breach).

Low-loss taps are essential. A tap must extract a portion
of
the through-signal. This, however, should not have the
effect of
significantly reducing the level of the remaining signal.
For
example, if one-quarter of the incident signal is extracted,
then
there is a 1.25 db loss in the remaining through-signal,
which
can easily be detected.

Cheers,
Ed Gerck

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

Re: unintended consequences?
country flaguser name
United States
2007-08-08 20:47:58
> Does that mean that the new fiber is less tappable?

Somehow, I suspect that Corning and the relevant authorities
have been
in touch to work out any problems.

Corning is a politically very well connected company.  Amory
Houghton,
a member of the family that has controlled the company since
its
founding in 1851, was company CEO from 1965-84, and was then
the
member of Congress from my district from 1986-2005.  His
father was
CEO and later ambassador to France.  His grandfather was CEO
and later
member of Congress and then ambassador to first Germany and
later
Britain.  You get the idea.

R's,
John


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

[1-3]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )