List Info

Thread: Re: flavors of reptile lubricant, was Another Snake Oil Candidate




Re: flavors of reptile lubricant, was Another Snake Oil Candidate
country flaguser name
United States
2007-09-13 15:32:04
Hi Folks,

My last comment on this. I've stated my own personal opinion
and  
anyone is free to disagree.

On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:

> On 13 Sep 2007 13:45:42 -0000, John Levine
<johnliecc.com> wrote:
>> I always understood snake oil crypto to refer to
products that  
>> were of
>> no value to anyone, e.g., products that claim to
have secret
>> unbreakable encryption, million bit keys, or
"one time pads" produced
>> by PRNGs.
>
> hear hear!
>
> I think in the zeal for criticism of the IronDrive,
folks have
> expanded the definition of Snake Oil to include
"All" security
> products.
>
> I don't like the "Military Grade AES
Encryption" phrase that IronDrive
> uses on their website, cause that implies they know
what Military is
> using. Maybe somebody should notify DoD that these
IronDrive folks
> know what Military uses to encrypt info 
>
> But other then that I don't see any Snake Oil Crypto
like
> techno-babble used by IronDrive Marketing.

I don't know if a product has to meet m of n criteria as
stated in  
<http://www.interhack.net/people/cmcurtin/snake-oi
l-faq.html>, but,  
IMO, IronKey meets the following criteria: Technobabble,
Experienced  
Security Experts, "Military Grade" and to a
certain extend  
Unbreakability (normally applied to software, but IronKey
claims the  
epoxy prevents "criminals from getting to the internal
hardware  
components").

Respectfully,
Aram Perez

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

RE: flavors of reptile lubricant, was Another Snake Oil Candidate
user name
2007-09-13 19:49:05
Well, I don't want to start a flame war (drop me a note
offline if I'm
coming across as doing so), but I do want to respond to one
point.  

Ali Saqib wrote:

> I don't like the "Military Grade AES
Encryption" phrase that IronDrive
> uses on their website, cause that implies they know
what Military is
> using. Maybe somebody should notify DoD that these
IronDrive folks
> know what Military uses to encrypt info 
>
> But other then that I don't see any Snake Oil Crypto
like
> techno-babble used by IronDrive Marketing.

Similarly, Aram Perez objected to the use of "Military
Grade" in the IronKey
promotional materials


However, according to those promotional materials IronKey
uses AES-I think
AES-256 although I can't find a reference to 256-bit key use
in the chip.  

According to Wikipedia the U.S. Department of Defense (NSA)
has certified
AES for Type-1 applications in the U.S. government.  See
also, CNSSP-15 and
htt
p://www.nsa.gov/ia/industry/crypto_suite_b.cfm  A little
exploring of the
net finds a number of documents that my browser says are
housed on domains
ending in .mil that mention the use of AES-in particular for
communications
between U.S. and coalition forces.  I think these facts
qualify AES as
"military grade."  

Chuck Jackson


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )