Hi Folks,
My last comment on this. I've stated my own personal opinion
and
anyone is free to disagree.
On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:33 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2007 13:45:42 -0000, John Levine
<johnl iecc.com> wrote:
>> I always understood snake oil crypto to refer to
products that
>> were of
>> no value to anyone, e.g., products that claim to
have secret
>> unbreakable encryption, million bit keys, or
"one time pads" produced
>> by PRNGs.
>
> hear hear!
>
> I think in the zeal for criticism of the IronDrive,
folks have
> expanded the definition of Snake Oil to include
"All" security
> products.
>
> I don't like the "Military Grade AES
Encryption" phrase that IronDrive
> uses on their website, cause that implies they know
what Military is
> using. Maybe somebody should notify DoD that these
IronDrive folks
> know what Military uses to encrypt info
>
> But other then that I don't see any Snake Oil Crypto
like
> techno-babble used by IronDrive Marketing.
I don't know if a product has to meet m of n criteria as
stated in
<http://www.interhack.net/people/cmcurtin/snake-oi
l-faq.html>, but,
IMO, IronKey meets the following criteria: Technobabble,
Experienced
Security Experts, "Military Grade" and to a
certain extend
Unbreakability (normally applied to software, but IronKey
claims the
epoxy prevents "criminals from getting to the internal
hardware
components").
Respectfully,
Aram Perez
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomo metzdowd.com
|