List Info

Thread: Re: forward-secrecy for email? (Re: Hushmail in U.S. v. Tyler Stumbo)




Re: forward-secrecy for email? (Re: Hushmail in U.S. v. Tyler Stumbo)
country flaguser name
United States
2007-11-05 17:05:11
> What about deleting the private key periodically?
>
> Like issue one pgp sub-key per month, make sure it has
expiry date etc
> appropriately, and the sending client will be smart
enough to not use
> expired keys.
>
> Need support for that kind of thing in the PGP
clients.

Forgive the additional nag, but that is OpenPGP clients. PGP
clients  
are my software. Mind you, I'm in favor of it, but (e.g.)
Hushmail is  
not a PGP client. It has nothing to do with PGP
Corporation.

>
> And hope your months key expires before the lawyers get
to it.
>
> Companies have document retention policies for stuff
like
> this... dictating that data with no current use be
deleted within some
> time-period to avoid subpoenas reaching back too far.
>

Well, we had some good news this weekend that RFC 4880, the
updated  
RFC 2440 is finally published. The OpenPGP working group has
other  
work it would like to do, including Perfect Forward
Secrecy.

	Jon

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography"
to majordomometzdowd.com

[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )