List Info

Thread: RE: 2.2.2 slow




RE: 2.2.2 slow
country flaguser name
United States
2007-04-05 10:28:47
Hey Larry, I see you are still lurking on the list.  Since
you brought this up, I haven't really been able to figure
out
what exactly the difference is on the 8.1 and 8.2 versions.
They are both being actively developed so I don't see which
is the best "new" version?

In Gentoo world they only have ebuilds for 8.1 but it
didn't
look like 8.2 is the devel tree.

Thanks.

--
David A. Niblett               | email: niblettdagru.com
Network Administrator          | Phone: (352) 334-3400
Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/
 

-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Larry Rosenman
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:29 AM
To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow


I would recommend 8.1 or 8.2 very much.  there are LOTS of
performance
enhancements in both of those releases.

LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler

Phone: +1 512-248-2683                E-Mail: lerlerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Eric Hiller
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:10 PM
To: dbmaildbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

It is postgresql server, but not pg8, it is 7.4.8, so no
autovacuum (as
far 
as I know).

If I upgraded to svn would I need to do anything besides
just
recompiling 
the source? (just make and install)

- Eric


>From: "Aaron Stone" <aaronserendipity.cx>
>Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist <dbmaildbmail.org>
>To: <jessekci.net>, "DBMail
mailinglist" <dbmaildbmail.org>
>Subject: Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow
>Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:35:58 -0000
>
>SVN should be stable at this time, though we have a few
bugs 
>outstanding that have not been completely identified and
resolved. Your

>mileage may vary.
>
>But that's sort of beside the point -- pegging the cpu
at 100% for 2 
>seconds upon each message delivery is not a
"performance issue," it's a

>disaster! Something on Eric's machine is not right, and
hopefully we'll

>be able to help identify and resolve the issue with
him.
>
>Aaron
>
>On Wed, Apr 4, 2007, Jesse Norell <jessekci.net> said:
>
> > There have been some changes to improve speed
since 2.2.2 though, 
> > haven't there?  From irc conversation, another
pertinent question 
> > is, is 2.2 svn stable right now?  I know there
were a run of issues 
> > a week or two back, but have the major issues
cleared?  If so, Eric 
> > could probably try latest svn and report back on
speed differences.
> >
> > Jesse
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:33 +0000, Aaron Stone
wrote:
> >> That's not DBMail being slow, it's your
database. Run top during
>message
> >> delivery and you'll see who's eating the cpu.
Most likely you need 
> >> to vacuum/optimize/analyze your tables.
dbmail-util -c will do this

> >> for
>you.
> >>
> >> Aaron
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2007, Eric Hiller
<mrraptor98hotmail.com> said:
> >>
> >> > I have been running 2.2.2 and it has been
very stable.  Ran it as
>soon as it
> >> > came out and it worked on a test machine.
 Only thing is it is 
> >> > MUCH
>slower
> >> > than 2.0.10. Any mail request and the sql
server cpu is pegged at
>100% for
> >> > 2+ seconds.  Is this issue resolved, or
will it be in 2.2.5?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks much for dbmail it really has been
great,
> >> > Eric
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Norell - jessekci.net
> > Kentec Communications, Inc.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DBmail mailing list
> > DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> >
>
>--
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>DBmail mailing list
>DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

____________________________________________________________
_____
The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours:
$0 by
Experian. 
http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/d
efault.aspx?sc=660600&bcd=EMAILFOOTE
RAVE
RAGE

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

RE: 2.2.2 slow
country flaguser name
United States
2007-04-05 10:34:41
8.2 has many more new features and optimizations and is the
CURRENT stable
release.  8.3tobe is in feature freeze, with release
hopefully around
summer.

there should be a build for 8.2 somewhere for gentoo, but
I'm not a gentoo
user currently (RHEL4 at work, FreeBSD at home).

LER

-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler

Phone: +1 512-248-2683                E-Mail: lerlerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893


-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf
Of Niblett, David A
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 10:29 AM
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

Hey Larry, I see you are still lurking on the list.  Since
you brought this up, I haven't really been able to figure
out
what exactly the difference is on the 8.1 and 8.2 versions.
They are both being actively developed so I don't see which
is the best "new" version?

In Gentoo world they only have ebuilds for 8.1 but it
didn't
look like 8.2 is the devel tree.

Thanks.

--
David A. Niblett               | email: niblettdagru.com
Network Administrator          | Phone: (352) 334-3400
Gainesville Regional Utilities | Web: http://www.gru.net/
 

-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Larry Rosenman
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:29 AM
To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
Subject: RE: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow


I would recommend 8.1 or 8.2 very much.  there are LOTS of
performance
enhancements in both of those releases.

LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler

Phone: +1 512-248-2683                E-Mail: lerlerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Eric Hiller
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 9:10 PM
To: dbmaildbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow

It is postgresql server, but not pg8, it is 7.4.8, so no
autovacuum (as
far 
as I know).

If I upgraded to svn would I need to do anything besides
just
recompiling 
the source? (just make and install)

- Eric


>From: "Aaron Stone" <aaronserendipity.cx>
>Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist <dbmaildbmail.org>
>To: <jessekci.net>, "DBMail
mailinglist" <dbmaildbmail.org>
>Subject: Re: [Dbmail] 2.2.2 slow
>Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:35:58 -0000
>
>SVN should be stable at this time, though we have a few
bugs 
>outstanding that have not been completely identified and
resolved. Your

>mileage may vary.
>
>But that's sort of beside the point -- pegging the cpu
at 100% for 2 
>seconds upon each message delivery is not a
"performance issue," it's a

>disaster! Something on Eric's machine is not right, and
hopefully we'll

>be able to help identify and resolve the issue with
him.
>
>Aaron
>
>On Wed, Apr 4, 2007, Jesse Norell <jessekci.net> said:
>
> > There have been some changes to improve speed
since 2.2.2 though, 
> > haven't there?  From irc conversation, another
pertinent question 
> > is, is 2.2 svn stable right now?  I know there
were a run of issues 
> > a week or two back, but have the major issues
cleared?  If so, Eric 
> > could probably try latest svn and report back on
speed differences.
> >
> > Jesse
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 20:33 +0000, Aaron Stone
wrote:
> >> That's not DBMail being slow, it's your
database. Run top during
>message
> >> delivery and you'll see who's eating the cpu.
Most likely you need 
> >> to vacuum/optimize/analyze your tables.
dbmail-util -c will do this

> >> for
>you.
> >>
> >> Aaron
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2007, Eric Hiller
<mrraptor98hotmail.com> said:
> >>
> >> > I have been running 2.2.2 and it has been
very stable.  Ran it as
>soon as it
> >> > came out and it worked on a test machine.
 Only thing is it is 
> >> > MUCH
>slower
> >> > than 2.0.10. Any mail request and the sql
server cpu is pegged at
>100% for
> >> > 2+ seconds.  Is this issue resolved, or
will it be in 2.2.5?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks much for dbmail it really has been
great,
> >> > Eric
> >
> > --
> > Jesse Norell - jessekci.net
> > Kentec Communications, Inc.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DBmail mailing list
> > DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> >
>
>--
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>DBmail mailing list
>DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

____________________________________________________________
_____
The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours:
$0 by
Experian. 
http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/d
efault.aspx?sc=660600&bcd=EMAILFOOTE
RAVE
RAGE

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )