Re: 2.2.2 slow

Paul J Stevens wrote:

> I've changed this setup for header and envelope
retrieval. Now the queries run
> in batches, retrieving the required information only
for a limited number of
> messages per query (500). And while throughput suffers
a bit because of this,
> the latency that occured before while waiting for the
query results is now
> practically gone.

Nice!

>> From irc conversation, another pertinent question
is, is
>> 2.2 svn stable right now?  I know there were a run
of issues a week or
>> two back, but have the major issues cleared?  If
so, Eric could probably
>> try latest svn and report back on speed
differences.
> 
> Those issues have been all but resolved as far as I can
tell. Sometimes messages
> keep staying at status unread in thunderbird and that
needs to be resolved, and

I have had complaints about this too. I probably could get
some level 5 
logs, interested?

> I've also suspect that outlook still suffers the
'message UID has changed'
> problem (I can't find the bug report for this one) that
has bugged dbmail
> already since way back when.
> 
> I did do some small changes that may affect this
particular bug though. The
> UIDNEXT values is determined slightly differently to
match the RFC requirements
> better, and no EXPUNGE messages are sent in response to
FETCH commands. That
> last one was done to accomodate a outlook express bug
that was uncovered by the
> Dovecot team. So every one who cares is kindly invited
to test the stable branch
> with outlook office if they can, and report back.

I'll sure try this on Monday or Tuesday, I downgraded back
to 2.2.2 from 
2.2.4 after one and a half days because of this.


This kind of summaries about current issues are very
helpful. I often 
check the bug tracker, but it doesn't give a good overview
nor are 
always all current issues in it.

Sorry for OT.

Thanks,
	Alex
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Aleksander wrote:
>> Those issues have been all but resolved as far as I
can tell.
>> Sometimes messages
>> keep staying at status unread in thunderbird and
that needs to be
>> resolved, and
> 
> I have had complaints about this too. I probably could
get some level 5
> logs, interested?

No need. It's already fixed.

> 
>> I've also suspect that outlook still suffers the
'message UID has
>> changed'
>> problem (I can't find the bug report for this one)
that has bugged dbmail
>> already since way back when.
>>
>> I did do some small changes that may affect this
particular bug
>> though. The
>> UIDNEXT values is determined slightly differently
to match the RFC
>> requirements
>> better, and no EXPUNGE messages are sent in
response to FETCH
>> commands. That
>> last one was done to accomodate a outlook express
bug that was
>> uncovered by the
>> Dovecot team. So every one who cares is kindly
invited to test the
>> stable branch
>> with outlook office if they can, and report back.
> 
> I'll sure try this on Monday or Tuesday, I downgraded
back to 2.2.2 from
> 2.2.4 after one and a half days because of this.

I have no idea how the 2.2 branch behaves now for regular
outlook users,
so any test results are most welcome.




-- 
 
____________________________________________________________
____
  Paul Stevens                                      paul at
nfg.nl
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP:
1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail