Re: dbmail LBL cluster report

19.07.07, 22:29, Alexander Benaguev <zulsigmatrans.ru>:

> hi, list
> I just did little 3-node LBL cluster for some network
services and 
> especially for dbmail. each node is domU on separate
xen server with 
> 1024M RAM and 2 VCPUs. all this stuff is loadbalancing
by LVS (which 
> live in separate domU too) and healthchecking by
keepalived. works 
> great. I think (but not sure), that separating dbmail
on different VMs 
> (even if you have only one physical server) is good
idea, until dbmail 
> team will not implement multi-foo architecture. I do
not strict tests 
> yet, but users said, that LBLed dbmail shows damn
better robustness. 
> more taste things it's connection persistence which
providing by LVS and 
> highly decreased annoying "opening folder..."
pauses (thunderbird's 
> "feature"), high availability and better
hardware utilization. if 
> anybody interesting, I'll post howto to wiki.
> alexander
> p.s. I believe that LBL advantages will works only if
you have powerful 
> DB server
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmaildbmail.org
> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Hmm... Very interestingly!
Please post your howto on wiki or on any web resource!
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail