Is that so?
Actually this feature is quite important for me. The
rational is that there
were cases in the past where users who claimed that they did
not receive an
important mail, where it was actually they did not open the
email (ignore)
and simply put the blame on the email system.
This is the time when the system admins need to defend
themselves (and the
system). Such mail log could be crucial for them. If the
mail log only shows
delivery receipt for the virtual email then there will be
room for argument
such as:-
- Does the mail really delivered to the mailbox?
- Does the user already in the virtual list at the time of
mail delivery as
mail admin could be at fault as he maybe forgot to include
the email user into
the virtual list and only add them later when dispute arises
to cover his
fault.
I hope there will be solution to this matter.
--
Regards
Jamalulkhair Khairedin
R&D Team
Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC),
Lot E302-E304, Enterprise Building 3,
63000 Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Tel. 603 83191200, Fax: 603 83193206
My personal blog
http://www.ridinglinux.org
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 10:59, Aaron Stone wrote:
> This reporting is only at a much higher trace level.
There is no concise
> reporting for final mailbox delivery. I like the idea,
however!
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007, Jamalulkhair Khairedin
<jamal oscc.org.my> said:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > We managed to install dbmail within our working
environment and the
> > system is working fine so far. We were using
traditional mbox-style
> > Postfix previously and the migration went
smoothly.
> >
> > But there is one thing that slightly bother me. I
found out that for mail
> > forward (virtual list) case, the maillog did not
report the final
> > destination meaning (exact mailbox) of the
designated recipients.
> >
> > Let say I have a virtual list (mail forward) named
salesourdomain.com
> > and this address consists of 2 people fooourdomain.com and
> > barourdomain.com, I need to see that both foo
& bar appear in the
> > maillog, something that helps me a lot in the past
when we were using the
> > traditional style postfix. This will prove that
the email indeed reach
> > it's final destination. So far for our new dbmail
setup, the log only
> > shows
> >
> > status=sent (215 Recipient <salesourdomain.com> OK)
> >
> > I'm not sure whether I have misconfiguration
somewhere in the setup and I
> > cannot find any documentation related to this
issue. Can somebody point
> > me to the right direction?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > --
> > Regards
> > Jamalulkhair Khairedin
> > R&D Team
> > Open Source Competency Centre (OSCC),
> > Lot E302-E304, Enterprise Building 3,
> > 63000 Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
> > Tel. 603 83191200, Fax: 603 83193206
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DBmail mailing list
> > DBmaildbmail.org
> > htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>
> --
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmaildbmail.org
> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
|
