My experience with dspam is that it loses email.
I lost several very expensive emails and if it weren't for
me leaving
it in debug mode, I would not have had the logs to indicate
it.
Later on I set up a script to search down the email messages
with
aggression and found that there was a routine incidence of
mail just
disappearing.
Dspam isn't something I would ever consider using again.
After
several postings to the group with specific logs showing the
lost
messages, and never receiving acknowledgment that there
might be any
kind of a bug. Dspam is not for me.
On Nov 1, 2007, at 12:50 PM, Jani Partanen wrote:
>
> It's not only my opinion.  But do as
you like, I didn't like that
> SA made
> so many mistakes and marked ham as spam. So far dspam
has done zero
> mistake.
> Sure it does not catch all spam messages but right now
it catch at
> least
> same rate as spamassassin did, but without mistakes.
And I have
> only train
> it month.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dbmail-bounces dbmail.org
>> [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf Of
Jorge Bastos
>> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 11:44 AM
>> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
>> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] DSPAM (was dbmail-lmtpd
eating cpu!)
>>
>> That's your opinion, and i have mine.
>> SA catch almost everything like you say from DSPAM,
so no
>> need to change.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
>> [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf Of
Jani Partanen
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 1 de Novembro de 2007 0:19
>> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
>> Subject: [Dbmail] DSPAM (was dbmail-lmtpd eating
cpu!)
>>
>> Spamassassin isn't even near that accuracy what you
gain with
>> dspam. I have both running, because spamassassin is
more
>> simple for users, but personally I run dspam and
after month
>> training it catch almost everything and most
important thing
>> is that it has not make any mistake so far, I mean
mark any
>> mail as spam when it wasn't.
>>
>> Dspam problem is that it needs little more work
until you get
>> all out of it, but when you have trained it well it
will give
>> you VERY good accuracy. And I'm speaking now 99,9%
accuracy.
>> Thats something you never get with spamassassin.
>>
>> But this goes off topic, so I at least change
subject..
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
>>> [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf Of
Jorge Bastos
>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:45 PM
>>> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
>>> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating cpu!
>>>
>>> I preffer spamassassin, works great, never had
problems, no need to
>>> change, and most of all, catch's about 90% of
the spam, and
>> messages
>>> that were not spam but catght are very very
rare.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
>>> [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf Of
Jani Partanen
>>> Sent: quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2007
21:21
>>> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
>>> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating cpu!
>>>
>>> It's very powerfull antispam solution.
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
>>>> [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 11:14 AM
>>>> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
>>>> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating
cpu!
>>>>
>>>> Dspam? What is that? :P
>>>> No, I don't use dspam.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
>>>> [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf Of Niki Guldbrand
>>>> Sent: quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2007
3:21
>>>> To: DBMail mailinglist
>>>> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] dbmail-lmtpd eating
cpu!
>>>>
>>>> Hi Jorge.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 20:33 +0000, Jorge
Bastos wrote:
>>>>> Paul,
>>>>> Check the files attached.
>>>>> This is the message that caused this.
>>>>> I have one file with the state of the
message while it was
>>>> in queue,
>>>>> because of the message that it was
giving, I "shoted" at it and
>>>>> deleted it and voilá, it was really
this message that
>> was causing
>>>>> lmtpd to
>>>> eat the CPU.
>>>>> Now, in wich circunstancies this
happened... I really
>>> have no idea.
>>>>> I have postfix with clamsmtpd and
spamd.
>>>>> Tell me what you need to help on this.
>>>>> I belive there's other guy with the
same problem once
>> in a while.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jorge
>>>>
>>>> If you look at the snippet below, doesn't
that look like
>>> the signature
>>>> bug that is/was(?) in dspam ?
>>>> Or am i totally off here ?
>>>>
>>>> ----- Snippet -----
>>>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>>>
boundary="--C3B11B941435CAC47D9BBFB287DA26D0"
>>>> ""
>>>>
>>>> ""
>>>> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
>>>>
>>>> ""
>>>>
>>>> This is a multi-part message in MIME
format.
>>>> ---- Snippet End ----
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Niki Guldbrand
>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>> DBmail mailing list
>>>> DBmaildbmail.org
>>>> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> DBmail mailing list
>>> DBmaildbmail.org
>>> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>>
>>>
_______________________________________________
>>> DBmail mailing list
>>> DBmaildbmail.org
>>> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DBmail mailing list
>> DBmaildbmail.org
>> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DBmail mailing list
>> DBmaildbmail.org
>> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmaildbmail.org
> htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
|
