Re: Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released

Hi Jorge,

but all with the same file size? I wonder if the guys are
implementing
some kind
of checksum too, then it won´t matter at all, I assume...

greetings,
Daniel

Jorge Bastos schrieb:
> It isn't impossible....
> For images for example, i have many many images that
have the name
> "logo.jpg", and are diferente things...
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf
> Of Simon Lange
> Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 19:52
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: AW: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
>
> Usually impossible, except that you try to hit this
impossibility manual.
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] Im Auftrag
> von Jorge Bastos
> Gesendet: Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 20:48
> An: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Betreff: RE: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
>
> Hum
> Imagining one situation.
>
> One email with an attach with name
"123456.zip", with the same size, but
> with different data inside the .zip file?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf
> Of Aleksander Kamenik
> Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 19:31
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
>
> khanh.truong1800GOTJUNK.COM wrote:
>   
>> I added this as a feature request/wish list on the
Wiki page and someone
>>     
> said this was already implemented in 2.2 by using
suppress_duplicates in
> dbmail.conf.
>   
>> So what is the difference here?
>>     
>
> If you send two identical emails (the same messege-id)
to the same 
> account, then only the first one will show up in your
inbox. The second 
> one will be silently dropped. Saving you the hassle of
looking at the 
> same email twice.
>
> The new storage model in 2.3 helps, if two accounts
receive the same 
> .zip file as attachments to some mails, then the .zip
attachment would 
> be stored in the db only once. Saving disk space on the
server.
>
> Totally different features.
>
> HTH,
>
>   
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

I did some search, i actually i have some of then with the
same size, same
number of bytes.




-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf
Of Daniel Urstöger
Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 20:21
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released

Hi Jorge,

but all with the same file size? I wonder if the guys are
implementing
some kind
of checksum too, then it won´t matter at all, I assume...

greetings,
Daniel

Jorge Bastos schrieb:
> It isn't impossible....
> For images for example, i have many many images that
have the name
> "logo.jpg", and are diferente things...
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
Behalf
> Of Simon Lange
> Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 19:52
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: AW: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
>
> Usually impossible, except that you try to hit this
impossibility manual.
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] Im
Auftrag
> von Jorge Bastos
> Gesendet: Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 20:48
> An: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Betreff: RE: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
>
> Hum
> Imagining one situation.
>
> One email with an attach with name
"123456.zip", with the same size, but
> with different data inside the .zip file?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org
[mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
Behalf
> Of Aleksander Kamenik
> Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 19:31
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
>
> khanh.truong1800GOTJUNK.COM wrote:
>   
>> I added this as a feature request/wish list on the
Wiki page and someone
>>     
> said this was already implemented in 2.2 by using
suppress_duplicates in
> dbmail.conf.
>   
>> So what is the difference here?
>>     
>
> If you send two identical emails (the same messege-id)
to the same 
> account, then only the first one will show up in your
inbox. The second 
> one will be silently dropped. Saving you the hassle of
looking at the 
> same email twice.
>
> The new storage model in 2.3 helps, if two accounts
receive the same 
> .zip file as attachments to some mails, then the .zip
attachment would 
> be stored in the db only once. Saving disk space on the
server.
>
> Totally different features.
>
> HTH,
>
>   
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Peter Rabbitson writes:
> James Cloos wrote:
>>>>>>> "Jani" == Jani
Partanen <jiipeesotapeli.fi> writes:
>>
>> Jani> Every time when you hash something what is
bigger than your
>> Jani> returned hash, there can be collision.
>>
>> You still talking about one chance in on the order
of 100000000000000000000.
>
> Is this what you will tell to the CEO when his
quarterly report turns 
> out to be a goatse pic? )

Do you refuse installing new software because the chance of
severe data 
corruption or bugs is worse than 1 in 100000000000000000000?
I am 
compelled to ask: Which storage medium do you prefer?

Arnt
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail