List Info

Thread: Re: Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released




Re: Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
country flaguser name
Australia
2007-12-17 16:58:50
I believe the files are MD5 hashed or similar, coupled with file length rather than name.

Jorge Bastos wrote:
jorgedecimal.pt" type="cite">
I did some search, i actually i have some of then with the same size, same
number of bytes.




-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail.org">dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [dbmail.org">mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On Behalf
Of Daniel Urstöger
Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 20:21
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released

Hi Jorge,

but all with the same file size? I wonder if the guys are implementing
some kind
of checksum too, then it won´t matter at all, I assume...


greetings,
Daniel


Jorge Bastos schrieb:
  
It isn't impossible....
For images for example, i have many many images that have the name
"logo.jpg", and are diferente things...




-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail.org">dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [dbmail.org">mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
    
Behalf
  
Of Simon Lange
Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 19:52
To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
Subject: AW: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released

Usually impossible, except that you try to hit this impossibility manual.



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: dbmail.org">dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [dbmail.org">mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] Im
    
Auftrag
  
von Jorge Bastos
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Dezember 2007 20:48
An: 'DBMail mailinglist'
Betreff: RE: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released

Hum
Imagining one situation.

One email with an attach with name "123456.zip", with the same size, but
with different data inside the .zip file?



-----Original Message-----
From: dbmail.org">dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org [dbmail.org">mailto:dbmail-bouncesdbmail.org] On
    
Behalf
  
Of Aleksander Kamenik
Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Dezembro de 2007 19:31
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released

1800GOTJUNK.COM">khanh.truong1800GOTJUNK.COM wrote:
  
    
I added this as a feature request/wish list on the Wiki page and someone
    
      
said this was already implemented in 2.2 by using suppress_duplicates in
dbmail.conf.
  
    
So what is the difference here?
    
      
If you send two identical emails (the same messege-id) to the same 
account, then only the first one will show up in your inbox. The second 
one will be silently dropped. Saving you the hassle of looking at the 
same email twice.

The new storage model in 2.3 helps, if two accounts receive the same 
.zip file as attachments to some mails, then the .zip attachment would 
be stored in the db only once. Saving disk space on the server.


Totally different features.


HTH,

  
    
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
dbmail.org">DBmaildbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
dbmail.org">DBmaildbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
  

Re: Re: DBMail 2.3.0 released
country flaguser name
United States
2007-12-17 17:16:36
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )