Michael Dexter wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> > I have the same question and found the same
answer on the wiki.
>> Perhaps
>>
>>> both Jorge and I are asking, "is dbmail
imapd-ssl planned?" Stunnel is
>>> good for those in the know but will be an
administration challenge with
>>> ordinary users plus can require acrobatics if
checking multiple
>>> accounts.
>>
>>
>> The only challenge in setting up stunnel is in
obtaining a
>> (self-signed?) certificate. And that very same
challenge will not go
>> away if and when dbmail acquired STARTTLS
capabilities.
>
>
> Perhaps I am missing something: the tunnel is only
active server side
> and joe-user need only click "use ssl" in
their mail client,
that's it. that's all! Assuming the server-side is setup
correctly.
> or they
> must create a tunnel from between their desktop and the
server, and
> point their mail client at localhost? (I am hoping not
but this is how I
> understand it to work after hours of searching. An
example with webdav:
> http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20040
303143205326)
>
>> Finally, I don't quite understand what you mean by
acrobatics when
>> checking multiple accounts...
>
>
> This is in the client-to-server tunnel scenario where a
different tunnel
> would be required for each imap server one connects to.
Tunnels are not required. There're not even supported in
dbmail-2.0
--
____________________________________________________________
____
Paul Stevens paul at
nfg.nl
NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP:
1024D/11F8CD31
The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmail dbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
|