Shared folder

Hello Mike,

======RBL=====
I using sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org which is a combination of those
see:
http://www.sp
amhaus.org/xbl/index.lasso

My complete updated list is: (Any suggestions?)
        reject_rbl_client sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org,
        reject_rbl_client zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net,
        reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org,
        reject_rbl_client opm.blitzed.org,
        reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org,
        reject_rbl_client blackholes.mail-abuse.org,
        reject_rbl_client relays.mail-abuse.org,

=====DSPAM=====
I don't care much about the graphs and charts in dspam it
is the math
approach I like. dspam uses SpamAssassin also but it
addition it
learns from your personal choices.

=====IMAP======

Yes, I meant port "993". Is there a difference
between '993' and
IMAPS? I thought of it as the same thing. Like port 80=http
and
443=https.

=====DBMA====

How are we doing on the DBMA?

Demi,


On 4/30/06, M. J. [Mike] OBrien <mikemobrien.com> wrote:
> You will find that the RBLs catch most of the junk if
you use good RBLs. I
> favour doing this in Postfix (extraordinarily
efficient) and not in the
> anti-SPAM daemon. A combination of the two can work
very well also. i.e.:
> have Postfix reject on the trusted RBLs and have your
SPAM daemon mark as
> **SPAM** on a positive from the less reliable RBLs.
Make sure SpamHaus XBL
> and SBL are among your up-front RBLs.
>
> The DSPAM Project is great. With libdspam you can do a
range of per user and
> per group filtering. I can't say it's any better than
SpamAssassin except
> for the GUIs which are certainly fine. My approach to
SPAM is to delete it.
> Never study it. Never make graphs and charts. Just
delete it. DSPAM lets you
> study spam and make graphs and reports.
>
>
> Did you mean port "993" for IMAPS?
>
> best...
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Demi" <gruesslegmail.com>
> To: "DBMail mailinglist" <dbmaildbmail.org>
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 8:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Shared folder
>
>
> On 4/29/06, M. J. [Mike] OBrien <mikemobrien.com> wrote:
> > sounds like dbmailadministrator/  is not writeable
> > chown dbmailadministrator/ and all files to httpd
user::group
> This was part of your install manual so I did that but
did I maybe use
> the wrong user? I did www-data (Debian Sarge)
> This is what it looks like:
> safe:/var/www/safe/admin/dbma# l
> total 772
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 www-data www-data    254 2006-03-07 21:24
AUTHORS
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 www-data www-data    317 2006-03-07 21:24
BUGS
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 www-data www-data  21511 2006-04-18 00:49
CHANGES
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 www-data www-data    391 2006-02-06 23:56
dbi-test.pl
>
>
> > sri forgot Spam (SpamAssassin is likely your best
choice for handling
> > SPAM)
> > perl -MCPAN -e shell
> > CPAN> install SpamAssassin
> >
> > Mike
> >
>
> SpamAssassin is OK but I am really sick of spam. I been
checking and
> dspam seams to be good. What do you think of dspam?
> http://d
spam.nuclearelephant.com/index.shtml
>
> --
>
> Demi
_______________________________________________
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmaildbmail.org
htt
ps://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail