yes, I support taking this draft on as a wg document.
-- Mark
Ralph Droms wrote:
> Stig and I, with the consent of Jari (our AD), will
expedite the handling of
> "DHCPv6 Server Reply Sequence Number Option",
> draft-volz-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-00, so it can be
submitted to the IESG at
> the same time as "DHCPv6 Relay Agent Assignment
Notification (RAAN) Option",
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-01 (which
depends on the SRSN
> draft).
>
> The plan is to:
>
> 1) accept draft-volz-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-00 as a WG
work item through
> e-mail consensus
> 2) review draft-volz-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-00 and
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-01 at the WG
meeting in San Diego
> to gain consensus for a WG last call on the drafts
> 3) hold the WG last call on the drafts
> 4) submit the drafts to the IESG
>
> To follow up on step 1, Stig and I ask for support for
accepting
> draft-volz-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-00 as a dhc WG work
item. If you have any
> comments on the draft as a WG work item, please respond
with e-mail to the
> mailing list. We need positive expressions of WG
consensus for acceptance
> as a work item, so please respond to the mailing list
with a short ack if
> are in support.
>
> - Ralph
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg ietf.org
> https://
www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg ietf.org
https://
www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
|