> Am I to take this as an assertion, by a Cisco employee,
that 95%
> of networks use single point of failure routers? Only
5% of networks
> use redundant routers (and therefore redundant relay
agents)?
Any comments I make are my own opinions. In the IETF, we're
all
individuals and represent ourselves.
I fail to understand why you're so hung up on this. Take
DOCSIS (cable)
- there is only a single relay (the CMTS) for each cable
segment.
I did NOT cite any study or survey. This is just my PERSONAL
opinion. As
you apparently disagree with it, that is your prerogative.
- Bernie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David W. Hankins [mailto avid_Han
kins isc.org]
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 12:28 PM
> To: dhcwg ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on
>
"DHCPRelayAgentAssignmentNotificationOption"
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 12:09:04PM -0400, Bernie Volz
(volz) wrote:
> > Most relay agents are in routers. That's what
this option
> essentially
> > assumes.
>
> Am I to take this as an assertion, by a Cisco employee,
that 95%
> of networks use single point of failure routers? Only
5% of networks
> use redundant routers (and therefore redundant relay
agents)?
>
> I still can't follow this trail of bread crumbs
you're leaving me.
>
> > If you want a reliable multiple-relay agent
technique,
> please feel free
> > to design it. That isn't what we attempted to do
here. We
> just felt it
> > useful to avoid the need for packet snooping.
>
> Fine, fine.
>
> --
> David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the
> first time,
> Software Engineer you'll just have to do
> it again."
> Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
>
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg ietf.org
https://
www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
|