Hi Justin,
Are you saying that 24-bit support does not work for you?
Which
version of FLAC are you using? What platform? What kind of
files
are you trying to compress?
I am not any kind of official spokesperson for FLAC, but
this alleged
report about 24-bit problems surfaced in Aug 2006. However,
I have
been successfully using 24-bit FLAC since June of 2004, and
I have
never seen a single problem. The largest FLAC-compressed
files are
69% of the original 24-bit file, and I have never seen one
end up
larger than the original. In other words, I have never been
able to
reproduce the problem. I have recorded about 90 live shows
in 24-bit
format, up to 18 channels multitrack, and have successfully
compressed over 75 GB of 24-bit audio with absolutely no
errors.
Why would you tell people to use WavPack when FLAC is
flawless?
Brian Willoughby
Sound Consulting
On Mar 30, 2007, at 11:34, Justin Frankel wrote:
> 2007/3/29, Brian Willoughby <brianw sounds.wa.com
> <mailto:brianwsounds.wa.com>>:
> There actually is no problem with 24-bit support,
as I stated
> earlier. So before people start chiming in with
"me too" - I'd
> like to request that you actually say what problem
you're seeing,
> along with a few details. Let's not start a rumor
fest here.
I actually joined this list because I wanted to see if this
problem
could be addressed... oh well we just tell people to use
WavPack...
-Justin
_______________________________________________
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-devxiph.org
http:
//lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
|
