Hi All,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:04:59PM -0700, Stephen F. Booth
wrote:
>> I think that what I actually want is for the
operating systems to use
>> .flac
>> instead. Similar to what Mac OS X does with .aiff.
This should probably
>> have been posted in the advocacy emailing list
instead.
>
> This is an interesting idea. There already is a FUSE
filesystem called
> mp3fs (http://mp3fs.sourceforg
e.net/) which can dynamically transcode files
> from FLAC to MP3. Perhaps someone should write
flacfs?
Hmm, that would be cool. Then you could mount mp3fs over the
top of it!
> The challenge for using FLAC would be to
determine/predict/estimate the
> FLAC file size in advance. Technical difficulties
aside, I think the idea
> of popping in a CD and having the files show up as FLAC
would be an
> appealing one to users.
Yes, this is a challenge. I am the author of mp3fs, and a
major
challenge was to predict final file size accurately. This is
why mp3fs
only supports CBR mp3 and not VBR mp3 or ogg (which is
inherently VBR).
Is there a 'CBR' flac encoding mechanism?
> I suppose another alternative would be to hack on
cddafs or one of its
> cousins to add FLAC support.
I hadn't heard of cddafs before, looks kinda neat.
Unfortunately, it
looks like a kernel-mode filesystem which would be
impossible to hack
flac support into (unless you want to port flac into kernel
space )
FUSE filesystems are much easier as you can use userspace
libs.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev xiph.org
http:
//lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
|