Scott is definitely correct for UDP NAT traversal. For TCP
and TLS
transports, we are planning to add support for
draft-ietf-sip-outbound
and draft-ietf-sip-gruu within the next month.
hope this helps.
thanks,
-rohan
On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:58, Scott Godin wrote:
> Besides rport and connection reuse and a built in STUN
server - repro
> does not have any special NAT support (as I suspect
asterick does).
> Clients connecting to repro should use some mechanism
like STUN or
> static configuration to discover their public IP
address and build the
> SIP messages appropriately.
>
> Scott
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: repro-devel-bounces list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:repro-devel-
>> bounces list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of welemon
lee
>> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 10:30 PM
>> To: repro-devel list.sipfoundry.org
>> Subject: [repro-devel] repro NAT questions
>>
>> hi ,
>>
>> all
>>
>> we have several softphone users behind firewall
and need NAT to
>> reach repro server. the users have subnet ip
address 192.168.15.XX
>> like this
>> but repro server is not located in this subnet. it
have a public ipv4
>> address.
>>
>> user A call user B, the invite message received
by repro server,
>> then repro forward the invite message to
192.168.15.XX, thus userB
>> cannot receive this invite message.
>>
>> how can i solve this problem, i have tried it
with asterisk
>> using NAT support. But i would like to use repro
anyway.
>>
>> Does repro handle this ?
>>
>> 3x
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> welemonlee
>> _______________________________________________
>> repro-devel mailing list
>> repro-devel list.sipfoundry.org
>> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/repro-devel
> _______________________________________________
> repro-devel mailing list
> repro-devel list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/repro-devel
_______________________________________________
repro-devel mailing list
repro-devel list.sipfoundry.org
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/repro-devel
|