|
List Info
Thread: Missing libg2c.so.0 ?
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 09:30:56 |
Quoting Thierry Thomas <thierry freebsd.org> (from Tue,
4 Jul 2006
21:09:21 +0200):
> Do you know where I could find this libg2c.so.0? There
is a libg2c.so in
> devel/linux_devtools, but it depends on linux_base-8
and the default is
> now linux_base-fc-4_2.
It's a linux lib, not a FreeBSd lib. And the devtools port
will go
away (deprecated/expiration date set).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
COMPASS [for the CDC-6000 series] is the sort of assembler
one expects from a corporation whose president codes in
octal.
-- J.N. Gray
http://www.Leidinger.net
Alexander Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org
netchild FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 14:26:36 |
Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander Leidinger.net> on Wed 5 jul
11:30:56 2006:
>> Do you know where I could find this libg2c.so.0?
There is a libg2c.so in
>> devel/linux_devtools, but it depends on
linux_base-8 and the default is
>> now linux_base-fc-4_2.
>
> It's a linux lib, not a FreeBSd lib.
I know, this is why I asked on the -emulation list
> And the devtools port will go
> away (deprecated/expiration date set).
Is there a plan to make such a port against linux_base-fc?
Else I shall try to make a small port only for this lib.
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 14:56:24 |
Quoting Thierry Thomas <thierry FreeBSD.org> (from Wed,
05 Jul 2006
16:26:36 +0200):
>> And the devtools port will go
>> away (deprecated/expiration date set).
>
> Is there a plan to make such a port against
linux_base-fc?
No, linux development should be done with a linux_dist port,
it
provides a more complete environment for this task.
> Else I shall try to make a small port only for this
lib.
If you need this linux lib we have two possibilities:
1) make a port with it
2) add it to the fc4 linux base
If there's only one or two ports which need the lib, I
suggest 1), if
there are a lot more ports, I suggest 2).
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Law of the Perversity of Nature:
You cannot successfully determine beforehand which side of
the
bread to butter.
http://www.Leidinger.net
Alexander Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org
netchild FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 15:30:36 |
Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander Leidinger.net> on Wed 5 jul
16:56:24 2006:
> If you need this linux lib we have two possibilities:
> 1) make a port with it
> 2) add it to the fc4 linux base
>
> If there's only one or two ports which need the lib, I
suggest 1), if
> there are a lot more ports, I suggest 2).
I need it only for one port (the next upgrade of
french/gibi), but it
might be useful for other ports. Do you know if it is
commonly used?
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 16:55:45 |
On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 17:30:36 +0200 Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander Leidinger.net> on Wed 5 jul
> 16:56:24 2006:
> > If you need this linux lib we have two
possibilities:
> > 1) make a port with it
> > 2) add it to the fc4 linux base
> >
> > If there's only one or two ports which need the
lib, I suggest 1), if
> > there are a lot more ports, I suggest 2).
> I need it only for one port (the next upgrade of
french/gibi), but it
> might be useful for other ports. Do you know if it is
commonly used?
I searched the ports tree. Only linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 and
linux_devtools has this file. I assume that it's not widely
used.
OK, for the first time I'll do a new port (which may be
incorporated
to linux_base-fc4 if needed further). Will the port name
linux-libf2c
be good?
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone
& Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The
Power To Serve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 17:02:30 |
Le Mer 5 jul 06 à 18:55:45 +0200, Boris Samorodov
<bsam ipt.ru>
écrivait :
> > I need it only for one port (the next upgrade of
french/gibi), but it
> > might be useful for other ports. Do you know if it
is commonly used?
>
> I searched the ports tree. Only
linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 and
> linux_devtools has this file. I assume that it's not
widely used.
> OK, for the first time I'll do a new port (which may
be incorporated
> to linux_base-fc4 if needed further). Will the port
name linux-libf2c
> be good?
Great! But this is libg2c, not libf2c
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 17:19:38 |
Thierry Thomas wrote at 17:30 +0200 on Jul 5, 2006:
> Quoting Alexander Leidinger <Alexander Leidinger.net> on Wed 5 jul
> 16:56:24 2006:
>
> > If you need this linux lib we have two
possibilities:
> > 1) make a port with it
> > 2) add it to the fc4 linux base
> >
> > If there's only one or two ports which need the
lib, I suggest 1), if
> > there are a lot more ports, I suggest 2).
>
> I need it only for one port (the next upgrade of
french/gibi), but it
> might be useful for other ports. Do you know if it is
commonly used?
libg2c is part of the gcc-g77 rpm.
g77 has been replaced by gfortran in the gcc 4.x series.
gfortran doesn't need/use/build libg2c.
So if you want to still try to use this app (which seems to
be built
from the older g77/gcc compilers), you need to include a
dependency
on the gcc-g77 rpm.
As Alexander said, you can either include that rpm directly
in your
port or add a separate port for it. To help decide, you
might have to
grub around the linux ports to see if anything else might
depend on
fortran stuff.
We probably don't want it in the fc4 linux base. fc4 uses
gcc-4
and gfortran as opposed to the old g77.
Your other option is to see if you can find or build a
version of your
linux app based on a newer gcc/gfortran (that doesn't bring
in the
libg2c dependency). This is best IMO if that option is
available.
That said, the new version of your port may then have a
dependency on
libgfortran and you may be trading one missing dep for
another. I
have not looked to see if any of the linux-* ports have been
made that include libgfortran. I suspect not. In fedora
core, that
lib is in the libgfortran rpm.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 17:52:06 |
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 19:02:30 +0200 Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Mer 5 jul 06 à 18:55:45 +0200, Boris Samorodov
<bsam ipt.ru>
> écrivait :
> > > I need it only for one port (the next upgrade
of french/gibi), but it
> > > might be useful for other ports. Do you know
if it is commonly used?
> >
> > I searched the ports tree. Only
linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 and
> > linux_devtools has this file. I assume that it's
not widely used.
> > OK, for the first time I'll do a new port (which
may be incorporated
> > to linux_base-fc4 if needed further). Will the
port name linux-libf2c
> > be good?
> Great! But this is libg2c, not libf2c
Yea, it's the library name, but the package name is
compat-libf2c-32-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm.
OK, let it be linux-libg2c.
I'm testing the new port.
WBR
--
Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone
& Internet SP
FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The
Power To Serve
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 18:28:41 |
Boris Samorodov wrote at 21:52 +0400 on Jul 5, 2006:
> Yea, it's the library name, but the package name is
> compat-libf2c-32-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm.
> OK, let it be linux-libg2c.
John E Hein wrote at 11:19 -0600 on Jul 5, 2006:
> libg2c is part of the gcc-g77 rpm.
.
.
> We probably don't want it in the fc4 linux base. fc4
uses gcc-4
> and gfortran as opposed to the old g77.
I forgot about the compat-* rpms in fc4 (gone in fc5, fyi).
But I don't think we should put compat-* rpms in the linux
base port.
Depending on old compat libs is not very
"basic".
If compat libs are needed, they should probably go in a
separate port
or ports.
And perhaps that port should named with
"-compat-" to emphasize that
it contains less (or not at all) actively supported packages
and for
easier searches.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
| Missing libg2c.so.0 ? |

|
2006-07-05 22:05:23 |
Le Mer 5 jul 06 à 19:19:38 +0200, John E Hein <jhein timing.com>
écrivait :
> Your other option is to see if you can find or build a
version of your
> linux app based on a newer gcc/gfortran (that doesn't
bring in the
> libg2c dependency). This is best IMO if that option is
available.
Unfortunately, Gibi is a closed source application, and I
cannot change
it (it's why it has to run under Linux emulation on i386
only).
But Boris has ported this lib as
"lang/linux-libg2c": I have just tested
it, and everything works fine!
Regards,
--
Th. Thomas.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emu
lation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|
|
|
|