"Havoc Pennington" <hp redhat.com> wrote:
> Look at src/window.c:recalc_window_features() for
possible reasons
> metacity decided to disable fullscreenability.
>
> In this case it looks pretty clear though - the firefox
window isn't
> resizable, metacity disables fullscreen in that case
unless the window
> size is equal to the screen size and the window is not
decorated.
>
> It looks like 1280x1024 could be your screen size, so
my guess is that
> the window has a frame on it.
>
> I don't really know why the !window->decorated is
in the check in
> recalc_window_features but Elijah may well.
>
> This would explain why wine fullscreening works
sometimes, it probably
> works when the window is a) full screen size and b)
also disables the
> window decorations.
>
> Fullscreen mode would remove the decorations anyhow
though, is why I
> don't know why metacity checks this.
>From http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/1.3/ar01s05.ht
ml
"_NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN indicates that the window
should fill the entire screen
and have no window decorations. Additionally the Window
Manager is responsible for
restoring the original geometry after a switch from
fullscreen back to normal window."
As I understand the above quote it's the WM's
responsibility on application's
request to remove window decorations and resize a window to
fill the screen,
then restore its previous state when switching from a
fullscreen state.
So, all the checks metacity does for window decorations and
window size are
contradicting the spec IMO.
Also the fact that a window isn't resizeable means only
that it's not supposed
to be resizeable by a user, still allowing to resize it
programmatically.
--
Dmitry.
_______________________________________________
metacity-devel-list mailing list
metacity-devel-list gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/metacity-devel-
list
|