Recent benchmarks of Gtk+ on DirectFB

I was curious if anyone had some recent benchmarks of Gtk+
on DirectFB
compared to Gtk+ on TinyX?  We have found that on an
embedded system
that the Gtk+ and TinyX pair is quite sluggish and not as
responsive
as we would like it to be.  So I am interested in learning
more about
the state of Gtk+ on DirectFB.

_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
directfb-devdirectfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
directfb-dev

Hi,

There are not official benchmarks, but people normally
experience a
performance improvement when using DirectFB, especially when
there is a
hardware graphics accelerator.
GTK+ is quite well supported in DirectFB. Basically, all
your GTK+
programs that run in X will run smoothly in DirectFB.

Regards,
--
Pedro Aguilar

> I was curious if anyone had some recent benchmarks of
Gtk+ on DirectFB
> compared to Gtk+ on TinyX?  We have found that on an
embedded system
> that the Gtk+ and TinyX pair is quite sluggish and not
as responsive
> as we would like it to be.  So I am interested in
learning more about
> the state of Gtk+ on DirectFB.
>
> _______________________________________________
> directfb-dev mailing list
> directfb-devdirectfb.org
> http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
directfb-dev
>



_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
directfb-devdirectfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
directfb-dev

Hi,

On 3/28/07, Pedro Aguilar <paguilarjunkerhq.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are not official benchmarks, but people normally
experience a
> performance improvement when using DirectFB, especially
when there is a
> hardware graphics accelerator.
> GTK+ is quite well supported in DirectFB. Basically,
all your GTK+
> programs that run in X will run smoothly in DirectFB.


That is very encouraging.  For products that have a
hardware
accelerator, does DirectFB support OpenGL ES?

Sean

>
> Regards,
> --
> Pedro Aguilar
>
> > I was curious if anyone had some recent benchmarks
of Gtk+ on DirectFB
> > compared to Gtk+ on TinyX?  We have found that on
an embedded system
> > that the Gtk+ and TinyX pair is quite sluggish and
not as responsive
> > as we would like it to be.  So I am interested in
learning more about
> > the state of Gtk+ on DirectFB.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > directfb-dev mailing list
> > directfb-devdirectfb.org
> > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
directfb-dev
> >
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
directfb-devdirectfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
directfb-dev

Hi,

On 3/28/07, Denis Oliver Kropp <dokdirectfb.org> wrote:
> Sean Kelley schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 3/28/07, Pedro Aguilar <paguilarjunkerhq.net> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> There are not official benchmarks, but people
normally experience a
> >> performance improvement when using DirectFB,
especially when there is a
> >> hardware graphics accelerator.
> >> GTK+ is quite well supported in DirectFB.
Basically, all your GTK+
> >> programs that run in X will run smoothly in
DirectFB.
> >
> >
> > That is very encouraging.  For products that have
a hardware
> > accelerator, does DirectFB support OpenGL ES?
>
> What do you mean by support?
>
> You can integrate both of them by implementing the
IDirectFBGL interface.

I am asking whether this has been done before for Gtk+ when
using the
DirectFB backend.

Sean

>
> --
> Best regards,
>    Denis Oliver Kropp
>
> .------------------------------------------.
> | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics |
> | http://www.directfb.org/
                |
> "------------------------------------------"
>

_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
directfb-devdirectfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
directfb-dev