|
List Info
Thread: Re: number generator
|
|
| Re: number generator |
  United States |
2007-03-13 07:49:10 |
At 02:52 AM 3/13/2007, Duncan Booth wrote:
>Dick Moores <rdm rcblue.com> wrote:
>
> > But let's say there is one more constraint--that
for each n of the N
> > positive integers, there must be an equal chance
for n to be any of
> > the integers between 1 and M-N+1, inclusive. Thus
for M == 50 and N
> >== 5, the generated list of 5 should be as likely
to be [1,46,1,1,1]
> > as [10,10,10,10,10] or [14, 2, 7, 1, 26].
>
>I don't think what you wrote actually works. Any
combination including a 46
>must also have four 1s, so the digit 1 has to be at
least 4 times as likely
>to appear as the digit 46, and probably a lot more
likely than that.
Yes, I see you're right. Thanks.
>On the other hand, making sure that each combination
occurs equally often
>(as your example might imply) is doable but still leaves
the question
>whether the order of the numbers matters: are
[1,46,1,1,1] and [1,1,46,1,1]
>the same or different combinations?
If the added constraint is instead that the probability of
generating
a given list of length N be the same as that of generating
any other
list of length N, then I believe my function does the job.
Of course,
[1,46,1,1,1] and [1,1,46,1,1], as Python lists, are
distinct. I ran
this test for M == 8 and N == 4:
======================================================
def sumRndInt(M, N):
import random
while True:
lst = []
for x in range(N):
n = random.randint(1,M-N+1)
lst.append(n)
if sum(lst) == M:
return lst
A = []
B = []
for x in range(100000):
lst = sumRndInt(8,4)
if lst not in A:
A.append(lst)
B.append(1)
else:
i = A.index(lst)
B[i] += 1
A.sort()
print A
print B
print len(A), len(B)
===========================================================
a typical run produced:
[[1, 1, 1, 5], [1, 1, 2, 4], [1, 1, 3, 3], [1, 1, 4, 2], [1,
1, 5,
1], [1, 2, 1, 4], [1, 2, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 2], [1, 2, 4, 1],
[1, 3, 1,
3], [1, 3, 2, 2], [1, 3, 3, 1], [1, 4, 1, 2], [1, 4, 2, 1],
[1, 5, 1,
1], [2, 1, 1, 4], [2, 1, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3, 2], [2, 1, 4, 1],
[2, 2, 1,
3], [2, 2, 2, 2], [2, 2, 3, 1], [2, 3, 1, 2], [2, 3, 2, 1],
[2, 4, 1,
1], [3, 1, 1, 3], [3, 1, 2, 2], [3, 1, 3, 1], [3, 2, 1, 2],
[3, 2, 2,
1], [3, 3, 1, 1], [4, 1, 1, 2], [4, 1, 2, 1], [4, 2, 1, 1],
[5, 1, 1, 1]]
[2929, 2847, 2806, 2873, 2887, 2856, 2854, 2825, 2847, 2926,
2927,
2816, 2816, 2861, 2919, 2820, 2890, 2848, 2898, 2883, 2820,
2820,
2829, 2883, 2873, 2874, 2891, 2884, 2837, 2853, 2759, 2761,
2766, 2947, 2875]
35 35
Dick Moores
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor python.org
http://
mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
|
|
| Re: number generator |
  United States |
2007-03-13 07:58:40 |
So sorry. I meant this for the python list.
Dick Moores
At 05:49 AM 3/13/2007, Dick Moores wrote:
>At 02:52 AM 3/13/2007, Duncan Booth wrote:
> >Dick Moores <rdm rcblue.com> wrote:
> >
> > > But let's say there is one more
constraint--that for each n of the N
> > > positive integers, there must be an equal
chance for n to be any of
> > > the integers between 1 and M-N+1, inclusive.
Thus for M == 50 and N
> > >== 5, the generated list of 5 should be as
likely to be [1,46,1,1,1]
> > > as [10,10,10,10,10] or [14, 2, 7, 1, 26].
> >
> >I don't think what you wrote actually works. Any
combination including a 46
> >must also have four 1s, so the digit 1 has to be at
least 4 times as likely
> >to appear as the digit 46, and probably a lot more
likely than that.
>
>Yes, I see you're right. Thanks.
>
> >On the other hand, making sure that each
combination occurs equally often
> >(as your example might imply) is doable but still
leaves the question
> >whether the order of the numbers matters: are
[1,46,1,1,1] and [1,1,46,1,1]
> >the same or different combinations?
>
>If the added constraint is instead that the probability
of generating
>a given list of length N be the same as that of
generating any other
>list of length N, then I believe my function does the
job. Of course,
>[1,46,1,1,1] and [1,1,46,1,1], as Python lists, are
distinct. I ran
>this test for M == 8 and N == 4:
>======================================================
>def sumRndInt(M, N):
> import random
> while True:
> lst = []
> for x in range(N):
> n = random.randint(1,M-N+1)
> lst.append(n)
> if sum(lst) == M:
> return lst
>
>A = []
>B = []
>for x in range(100000):
> lst = sumRndInt(8,4)
> if lst not in A:
> A.append(lst)
> B.append(1)
> else:
> i = A.index(lst)
> B[i] += 1
>
>A.sort()
>print A
>print B
>print len(A), len(B)
>========================================================
===
>a typical run produced:
>[[1, 1, 1, 5], [1, 1, 2, 4], [1, 1, 3, 3], [1, 1, 4, 2],
[1, 1, 5,
>1], [1, 2, 1, 4], [1, 2, 2, 3], [1, 2, 3, 2], [1, 2, 4,
1], [1, 3, 1,
>3], [1, 3, 2, 2], [1, 3, 3, 1], [1, 4, 1, 2], [1, 4, 2,
1], [1, 5, 1,
>1], [2, 1, 1, 4], [2, 1, 2, 3], [2, 1, 3, 2], [2, 1, 4,
1], [2, 2, 1,
>3], [2, 2, 2, 2], [2, 2, 3, 1], [2, 3, 1, 2], [2, 3, 2,
1], [2, 4, 1,
>1], [3, 1, 1, 3], [3, 1, 2, 2], [3, 1, 3, 1], [3, 2, 1,
2], [3, 2, 2,
>1], [3, 3, 1, 1], [4, 1, 1, 2], [4, 1, 2, 1], [4, 2, 1,
1], [5, 1, 1, 1]]
>
>[2929, 2847, 2806, 2873, 2887, 2856, 2854, 2825, 2847,
2926, 2927,
>2816, 2816, 2861, 2919, 2820, 2890, 2848, 2898, 2883,
2820, 2820,
>2829, 2883, 2873, 2874, 2891, 2884, 2837, 2853, 2759,
2761, 2766, 2947, 2875]
>
>35 35
>
>Dick Moores
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tutor maillist - Tutor python.org
>http://
mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist - Tutor python.org
http://
mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
|
|
[1-2]
|
|