|
List Info
Thread: WGLC on EAP Network Selection Document
|
|
| WGLC on EAP Network Selection Document |
|
2006-07-14 14:04:28 |
No comments were received on the EAP Network Selection
document during EAP
WG last call.
This makes it difficult to tell whether this is because lots
of people read
it and could not find fault with it, or because few people
read it.
Therefore in order to move the document forward, we are
going to request
that individuals who have read the document post to the list
to indicate
that they approve its publication. If you have read it and
have comments,
please post these to the list as well. In order to move
forward, we will
need at least 5 people (other than the authors and WG
chairs) to indicate
approval.
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
|
|
| WGLC on EAP Network Selection Document |
|
2006-07-14 16:08:28 |
P.S. The deadline for posting comments is July 30, 2006.
>From: "Bernard Aboba" <bernard_aboba hotmail.com>
>To: eapfrascone.com
>Subject: [eap] WGLC on EAP Network Selection Document
>Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:04:28 -0700
>
>No comments were received on the EAP Network Selection
document during EAP
>WG last call.
>
>This makes it difficult to tell whether this is because
lots of people read
>it and could not find fault with it, or because few
people read it.
>
>Therefore in order to move the document forward, we are
going to request
>that individuals who have read the document post to the
list to indicate
>that they approve its publication. If you have read it
and have comments,
>please post these to the list as well. In order to
move forward, we will
>need at least 5 people (other than the authors and WG
chairs) to indicate
>approval.
>
>
>________________________________________________________
_________
>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options,
please visit:
>http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
>
>Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
|
|
| WGLC on EAP Network Selection Document |
|
2006-07-19 05:08:33 |
|
The draft is a good summary of the network selection problem. I wonder if there is a plan to update this document after the various SDOs make some progress in this area. Overall it looks good to go. Some editorials: - Page 4: "The selection is dependent upon for example the
; authentication credentials for the user / device and the roaming
agreements." If there are no other factors that selection is dependent on (besides that mentioned in the sentence immediately following this one), then remove the "for example". - Page 4: "The selection will be dependent upon for
; example the support for an access technology by the device and
; availability of such access technology based networks."
Same comment as above. - Page 15: "APs must support 802.1X pre-authentication (optional in IEEE 802.11i) ". The year of this standard should be specified, just like it is earlier in that sentence. What is meant here is probably IEEE 802.11i-2004. - Page 20: "solutions for problem of network selection" -- insert "the" before "problem". -Page 20: "more than one points" -- replace "points" with "point" Michaela
Bernard Aboba <bernard_abobahotmail.com> wrote: No comments were received on the EAP Network Selection document during EAP
WG last call.
This makes it difficult to tell whether this is because lots of people read
it and could not find fault with it, or because few people read it.
Therefore in order to move the document forward, we are going to request
that individuals who have read the document post to the list to indicate
that they approve its publication. If you have read it and have comments,
please post these to the list as well. In order to move forward, we will
need at least 5 people (other than the authors and WG chairs) to indicate
approval.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
Arhives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/eap
Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min. |
| WGLC on EAP Network Selection Document |
|
2006-07-20 20:58:39 |
Hi,
The document looks good to me.
One minor comment on Section 3.1:
"
The PANA protocol [17] has a mechanism to advertise and
select "ISPs"
through the exchange of the ISP-Information AVP in its
initial
exchange.
"
"
The use of
other network identifiers than domain names is also
possible, for
instance the PANA protocol uses an a free form string and
an SMI
Network Management Private Enterprise Code [17], or
Mobile Network
Codes embedded in NAIs as specified in 3GPP.
"
The description is true for the current version of PANA
specification.
However, the latest discussion in the PANA WG will make the
network
selection functionality be specified in a separate document
other than
specifying it in the PANA base specification.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Ohba
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:04:28AM -0700, Bernard Aboba
wrote:
> No comments were received on the EAP Network Selection
document during EAP
> WG last call.
>
> This makes it difficult to tell whether this is because
lots of people read
> it and could not find fault with it, or because few
people read it.
>
> Therefore in order to move the document forward, we are
going to request
> that individuals who have read the document post to the
list to indicate
> that they approve its publication. If you have read
it and have comments,
> please post these to the list as well. In order to
move forward, we will
> need at least 5 people (other than the authors and WG
chairs) to indicate
> approval.
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options,
please visit:
> http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
>
> Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
|
|
| WGLC on EAP Network Selection Document |
|
2006-07-20 21:21:35 |
Please disregard my minor comment in my previous email. I
was
referring that NAP and ISP separate authentication to be
removed from
PANA basic specification. There was no discussion to remove
the ISP
selection functionality in the PANA basic specification.
Sorry for my confusion.
Yoshihiro Ohba
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 04:58:39PM -0400, Yoshihiro Ohba
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The document looks good to me.
>
> One minor comment on Section 3.1:
>
> "
> The PANA protocol [17] has a mechanism to advertise
and select "ISPs"
> through the exchange of the ISP-Information AVP in
its initial
> exchange.
> "
>
> "
> The use of
> other network identifiers than domain names is also
possible, for
> instance the PANA protocol uses an a free form
string and an SMI
> Network Management Private Enterprise Code [17], or
Mobile Network
> Codes embedded in NAIs as specified in 3GPP.
> "
>
> The description is true for the current version of PANA
specification.
> However, the latest discussion in the PANA WG will make
the network
> selection functionality be specified in a separate
document other than
> specifying it in the PANA base specification.
>
> Best regards,
> Yoshihiro Ohba
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 07:04:28AM -0700, Bernard Aboba
wrote:
> > No comments were received on the EAP Network
Selection document during EAP
> > WG last call.
> >
> > This makes it difficult to tell whether this is
because lots of people read
> > it and could not find fault with it, or because
few people read it.
> >
> > Therefore in order to move the document forward,
we are going to request
> > that individuals who have read the document post
to the list to indicate
> > that they approve its publication. If you have
read it and have comments,
> > please post these to the list as well. In order
to move forward, we will
> > need at least 5 people (other than the authors and
WG chairs) to indicate
> > approval.
> >
> >
> >
____________________________________________________________
_____
> > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription
options, please visit:
> > http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
> >
> > Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
> >
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options,
please visit:
> http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
>
> Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
>
>
____________________________________________________________
__________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email
Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagela
bs.com/email
>
____________________________________________________________
__________
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
|
|
[1-5]
|
|