List Info

Thread: Issue 378: Network Selection Comments




Issue 378: Network Selection Comments
user name
2006-09-08 14:58:45
See responses inline.

BR,

Farooq

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:Bernard_Abobahotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:40 PM
> To: Bari, Farooq; eapfrascone.com
> Cc: 'Jari Arkko'; jouni.korhonenteliasonera.com
> Subject: RE: [eap] Issue 378: Network Selection
Comments
> 
>  [Bari, Farooq] Propose to change the first sentence as
follows
> 
> This refers to selection of the realm of an
operator/ISP in order to
> access the network.
> 
> [BA] The problem is that the realm need not necessarily
be provided by
the
> operator/ISP.  It could be a corporate realm, for
example.   So you
might
> just say either "selection of the realm used to
access the network" or
> "selection of the operator/ISP used for network
access".  The problem
is
> that I don't know which is meant here -- and they are
different.
> 
> 
[Bari, Farooq] I meant the first of the two. If others have
the same
understanding we can change it to "selection of the
realm used to access
the network".

> [Bari, Farooq] In issue 376 response we agreed to add a
new section on
> scalability in current section 4. I am not sure if this
needs to be
> added in section 2. The comment about RFC 4284 behavior
does not seem
to
> be correct - my understanding is that the realms are
not always
> advertised to the client.
> 
> [BA] Right -- realms may not always be advertised.  But
the issue
occurs
> when they need to be.  Glen's point was that RFC 4284
dumps the realm
table,
> most of which the client won't be able to use.  In
contrast, a
> request/response protocol would only return those
realms that the
client
> indicates that it can access.  This is not only more
efficient, but
also
> potentially addresses security concerns about exposing
the realm table
to
> non-authorized users.
> 
> 
[Bari, Farooq] I do not think RFC 4284 mandated a behavior
on the part
of the network that would imply that the client always gets
the entire
list of roaming partners of the e.g. the hotspot operator.
For example
it is possible that hotspot operator decides to advertise
only top three
roaming partners etc. But such logic is not something that
gets
standardized.

____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap

Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )