List Info

Thread: Re: review of netsel-05




Re: review of netsel-05
user name
2007-02-21 16:19:31
on 378 we had some discussion on the reflector a while back
and I am
attaching here the emails form that discussion. I think most
of the
comments were addressed with only a couple of the areas
where Bernard
needs to indicate if he is OK with our explanation.

 
Farooq Bari
 
farooq.bariatt.com
+1 425 580 5526
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bernard Aboba [mailto:bernard_abobahotmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:47 AM
> To: eapfrascone.com
> Subject: Re: [eap] review of netsel-05
> 
> I have resolved issues 330, 331, 332, 334, 335 and 336
as 
> fixed in NETSEL-05.  I am assuming that 333 will be
resolved in -06.
> 
> That still leaves Issues 374, 375, 376, 377, and 378
open.
> 
> Can the submitters of those issues look over the
document and 
> post whether their concerns have been resolved?
> 
> The document is available for inspection here:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-eap
-netsel-prob
> lem-05.txt
> 
> >Jari Arkko said:
> 
> >First, there are some open issues in the issue
tracker. I consider 
> >issues 330-336 now mostly closed, based on the
revisions in the new 
> >drafts. Thanks. For issue 333 there is one small
remaining 
> thing, noted 
> >below.
> >
> >What is the situation with the other issues? They
have been made for 
> >previous revisions, have they been resolved in
-05?
> >
> >I also re-read the document and noticed two small
editorial issues, 
> >also noted below.
> >
> >But otherwise I think the document is ready. Ship
it!
> >
> >Parts remaining from issue 333:
> >
> > >    Section 4 gives the conclusions
> > >    and some suggestions on how to proceed for
the rest.
> >This should be: "Section 4 presents our
conclusions."
> >
> >Editorial:
> >
> > >    discussion of the limitations of certain
classes of solution,
> >
> >s/solution/solutions/
> >
> >
> > > The solution ...
> >
> >Multiple occurrences of this. I think the draft
should not 
> assume that 
> >we have a single solution in this space.
> >Therefore, we should typically write
"Solutions should 
> satisfy ... " as 
> >opposed to "The solution should satisfy
..."
> 
> 
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options,
please visit:
> http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
> 
> Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
> 

____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap

Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )