Hi Jari,
You know what? I read: " I do not think we need a
protocol
definition...." as
" I do think we need...." -- big difference
So therefore listed all the other APIs.
So I agree with you. There is an API or there isnt? Its not
IETF's
domain.
Sorry for the confusion it was very early in the morning.
Avi
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko piuha.net]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:30 AM
> To: Avi Lior
> Cc: eapfrascone.com
> Subject: Re: [eap] Strawman -10/EMSK deletion
requirement?
>
> Avi Lior wrote:
>
> >
> >>I do not think we need a protocol definition
between the
> AAA and EAP
> >>layers; this is mostly an API in any case.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >What about the API to fetch the MSK? Or to Push the
MSK?
> >What about the API to send the EAP message from the
AAA to
> the EAP AS?
> >What about the API to retrieve the EAP message from
the EAP-AS?
> >Etc....why are we forgetting these as well?
> >
> >
> I am not saying that they are not needed. The question
is
> whether the IETF wants to get into the business of
> standardizing such APIs. We mostly deal with what
happens on
> the wire, in protocols.
>
> --Jari
>
>
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
|