Volunteers for Expert Review of EAP-SAKE?

Bernard Aboba <mailto:bernard_abobahotmail.com> supposedly
scribbled:

> Here is what RFC 3748 says:
> 
>    For registration requests where a Designated Expert
should be
>    consulted, the responsible IESG area director should
appoint the
>    Designated Expert.  The intention is that any
allocation will be
>    accompanied by a published RFC.  But in order to
allow for the
>    allocation of values prior to the RFC being approved
for
>    publication, the Designated Expert can approve
allocations once it
>    seems clear that an RFC will be published.  The
Designated expert
>    will post a request to the EAP WG mailing list (or a
successor
>    designated by the Area Director) for comment and
review, including
>    an Internet-Draft. 

The last sentence is the one of which I was thinking: since
the Dallas meeting was purportedly the last one for the EAP
WG, it seems as if this would be an opportune moment to
designate a successor (unless "last meeting" has
semantics similar to those of "WG Last Call"
.

>    Before a period of 30 days has passed, the
>    Designated Expert will either approve or deny the
registration
>    request and publish a notice of the decision to the
EAP WG mailing
>    list or its successor, as well as informing IANA.  A
denial notice
>    must be justified by an explanation, and in the
cases where it is
>    possible, concrete suggestions on how the request
can be modified
>    so as to become acceptable should be provided.
> 
> So the Designated expert is appointed by the AD
(typically based on a
> list of potential recruits).  The Expert then posts the
decision to
> the EAP WG (or designated successor).  
> 
> 
>> From: "Glen Zorn (gwz)" <gwzcisco.com>
>> To: "Bernard Aboba"
<bernard_abobahotmail.com>, <eapfrascone.com>
>> Subject: RE: [eap] Volunteers for Expert Review of
EAP-SAKE?
>> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:41:23 -0800
>> 
>> Bernard Aboba <mailto:bernard_abobahotmail.com> supposedly
>> scribbled: 
>> 
>>> We have a received a request for an RFC 3748
Type Code Review of the
>>> EAP SAKE specification.  The specification is
available here:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-va
nderveen-eap-sake-00.txt
>>> 
>>> If you would like to volunteer as the Expert
Reviewer, please send
>>> me a note.
>> 
>> Just out of curiosity, shouldn't this really have
gone to emu?
>> 
>> Hope this helps,
>> 
>> ~gwz
>> 
>> Why is it that most of the world's problems can't
be solved by simply
>>   listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel

Hope this helps,

~gwz

Why is it that most of the world's problems can't be
solved by simply
  listening to John Coltrane? -- Henry Gabriel
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap

Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap