On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:42:44AM -0700, Salowey, Joe
wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yoshihiro Ohba [mailto:yohba tari.toshiba.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:35 AM
> > To: Salowey, Joe
> > Cc: Yoshihiro Ohba; Bernard Aboba; eap frascone.com
> > Subject: Re: [eap] Re: Issue 352: Channel Binding
Issue
> >
> > On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 09:17:35AM -0700, Salowey,
Joe wrote:
> > > > > [Joe] Obsoleted by what?
> > > >
> > > > I'd say by CB with key mixing.
> > > >
> > > [Joe] I don't agree. For one there are
usages of EAP which
> > do not use
> > > EAP keying material so key mixing will not
work for them.
> > >
> >
> > Can you elaborate on the usages you mentioned
above?
> >
> [Joe] 802.1x
If EAP keying material is not used for secure association at
all, I
don't think CB is possible because an attacker
authenticator can
simply spoof legitimate authenticator's parameters. This
can happen
in the case of wired 802.1X as well. Am I wrong?
Yoshihiro Ohba
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
|