List Info

Thread: +AFs-eap+AF0- Questions for draft-barany-eap-gee-01




+AFs-eap+AF0- Questions for draft-barany-eap-gee-01
user name
2006-06-14 14:10:40
Sorry for miss operation to previous wrong email,

> Let's keep this at individual level, please. 
==> You could say "folks knowledgeable in 3GPP2
"
Maybe you are not happy with company name

> I said that the GEE 
> encapsulation is generic, also more on the
applicability below.
I have to repeat again, the problem is quite limited.

-Hui

Disclaimer:
The contents of this e-mail, and its attachments, if any,
are confidential and may be protected
by law against any unauthorized use.  If you have received
this e-mail by mistake or have
reason to believe that you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender by reply
e-mail as soon as possible and delete it from your computer
system immediately thereafter.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy
this e-mail or attachment or disclose
the contents to any other person.  While we have made every
effort to keep our network virus free,
we take no responsibility for any computer virus which might
be transferred by way of this e-mail.
____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap

Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
+AFs-eap+AF0- Questions for draft-barany-eap-gee-01
user name
2006-06-14 21:38:54
At 07:10 AM 6/14/2006, DENG, HUI -HCHBJ wrote:
>Sorry for miss operation to previous wrong email,

No problem.  I was confused by it for a while.


> > Let's keep this at individual level, please.
>==> You could say "folks knowledgeable in 3GPP2
"
>Maybe you are not happy with company name

I went and looked at the reference to 3GPP2.  Cao Zhen asked
two 
3GPP2 and MMD specific questions and I responded saying that
we'll 
take those offline and have 3GPP2 folks to answer them.

Regarding your somewhat cryptic follow-up about company
names, here 
is some more clarification: The IETF asks that people bring 
individual opinions with the interest of making things work
on the 
Internet.  The IETF also helps other SDOs, 3GPP2 is one such

organization, and the IETF has a formal liaison relationship
with them.

So any email responses are individual opinions to
individuals' 
questions.  I for one may not be representing the opinion of
my 
employer (you might have seen people from the same company
stating 
differing opinions on the IETF lists) and cannot represent
an SDO 
(all official communication is through liaison statements).

So when you said that I didn't respond to a
"company,"  I don't, not 
in the IETF.


> > I said that the GEE
> > encapsulation is generic, also more on the
applicability below.
>I have to repeat again, the problem is quite limited.

I think we went over it and said barring the IKEv2 as the
lower layer 
case, GEE works with all other uses of EAP.  If that is
incorrect, I 
would like to hear your argument on that.  Thanks.

Lakshminath


>-Hui
>
>Disclaimer:
>The contents of this e-mail, and its attachments, if
any, are 
>confidential and may be protected
>by law against any unauthorized use.  If you have
received this 
>e-mail by mistake or have
>reason to believe that you are not the intended
recipient, please 
>notify the sender by reply
>e-mail as soon as possible and delete it from your
computer system 
>immediately thereafter.
>If you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy
this e-mail 
>or attachment or disclose
>the contents to any other person.  While we have made
every effort 
>to keep our network virus free,
>we take no responsibility for any computer virus which
might be 
>transferred by way of this e-mail.

____________________________________________________________
_____
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please
visit:
http:/
/lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap

Arhives: http://lists.
frascone.com/pipermail/eap
[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )