Re: 2.6.25-rc2-git1 test

Solofo Ramangalahy wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 4:24 PM, Dave Anderson <andersonredhat.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the informations and the patch!
>>>
>> Did it work?
> 
> Yes. Just tested, it goes further to the prompt.
> 
>> And I expect that
>> there will be several more crippling issues
associated with the data
>> structure changes associated with that merger.
> 
> Ok, understood.
> Would you like more reporting, as I try to analyze a
dump (and learn crash 
> or are the issues already known?

I'm amazed it made it to the prompt with just that change.

Reports would be fine, and if it's possible for you to make
the
vmcore and and vmlinux files available for me to download,
it
would probably help move things along quicker.

Has anybody tried an x86 2.6.25 kernel?

Dave

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utilityredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility

On Feb 19, 2008 4:53 PM, Dave Anderson <andersonredhat.com> wrote:
> I'm amazed it made it to the prompt with just that
change.

I checked it with 2.6.25-rc1-ext4-1 (but used 2.6.25-rc2 for
the
initial submission),
and double-checked with unpatched binary.
Appart from .config (which was defconfig + minimal changes
for kexec/kdump),
I think I did not forgot to disclose any information for
people to reproduce.

> Reports would be fine, and if it's possible for you to
make the
> vmcore and and vmlinux files available for me to
download, it
> would probably help move things along quicker.

I am contacting you off-list for the possibilities...
(short summary is that downloading 4GB dump at few dozens of
KB/s
is not easy, probably even compressed at ~50MB).

-- 
solofo

--
Crash-utility mailing list
Crash-utilityredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility