Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:49:56 -0700
> From: Darren Reed <Darren.Reed sun.com>
> Subject: Re: PSARC/2008/219 Committed API for packet
interception
>
> ...
> I've updated the spec, to include the above and the
other
> corrections.
>
> ...
> IPFilter hook naming
> --------------------
> For applications that wish to insert hooks before or
after IPFilter
> in the packet stack, the names used by IPFilter are
provided as an
> uncommitted interface:
>
>
+------------------+--------------------------+-------------
---+
> | Packet Hook | IPFilter Hook Name |
Classification |
>
+------------------+--------------------------+-------------
---+
> | NH_PHYSICAL_IN | "ipfilter_hook_in"
| Uncommitted |
> | NH_PHYSICAL_OUT | "ipfilter_hook_out"
| Uncommitted |
> | NH_LOOPBACK_IN |
"ipfilter_hook_loop_in" | Uncommitted |
> | NH_LOOPBACK_OUT |
"ipfilter_hook_loop_out" | Uncommitted |
>
+------------------+--------------------------+-------------
---+
>
>Does this case specify whether IPFilter supplies
ordering hints when
>establishing its hooks? If so, what are they? (This
would seem to be
>useful information for the applications alluded to above
to know.)
>
>
As IPfilter does not make use of the ordering hints, there
was
nothing to mention...well, I suppose I should have mentioned
that
it doesn't use them.
Darren
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc opensolaris.org
|