Opal precompile question

Wendy Baur wrote:
> All,
>
>     I was having issues with the precompiled headers
so, disabled them 
> through the project properties in Visual C++ 2005.  Can
anyone think 
> of a reason why I would need to compile opal with the
use of 
> percompiled headers?
>
> Wendy
>
Compilation speed.  Aside from that, I don't see any other
reason why it 
would affect the behavior of the binary produced by the
compiler.
------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Check the FAQ before asking! - http://www.
openh323.org/~openh323/fom.cgi
The OpenH323 Project mailing list, using Mailman. To
unsubscribe or
change your subscription options, goto
htt
p://www.openh323.org/mailman/listinfo/openh323
Maintained by Quicknet Technologies, Inc - http://www.quicknet.net
------------------------------------------------------------
------------

Wednesday, September 27, 2006 5:43 PM Wendy Baur wrote:

> I was having issues with the precompiled headers so, 
> disabled them through the project properties in Visual 
> C++ 2005.  Can anyone think of a reason why I would
need 
> to compile opal with the use of percompiled headers? 

Hmmm, what issues - could you explain? Today I've compiled
OPAL/pwlib 
from CVS under VS 2005, with no problems.

Reason - as Joegen wrote: (re)compilation, in most cases, is
faster for
large projects with many large, rarely changed headers.

I've read about problems with precompiled headers, but as I
said before - I
didn't have any with OPAL/pwlib.

Jacek Stobnicki

------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Check the FAQ before asking! - http://www.
openh323.org/~openh323/fom.cgi
The OpenH323 Project mailing list, using Mailman. To
unsubscribe or
change your subscription options, goto
htt
p://www.openh323.org/mailman/listinfo/openh323
Maintained by Quicknet Technologies, Inc - http://www.quicknet.net
------------------------------------------------------------
------------