Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:
> Brian Nisbet wrote:
>
>> Michele,
>>
>> The query is over the abuse details they have
listed in both
>> the RIPE database and places like abuse.net, rather
than phone
>> or postal details.
>>
>> That aside, however, currently there is no policy
or procedures
>> for RIPE to follow up on incorrect contact
information in the
>> database.
> [...]
>
> Nevertheless I have to comment that I perceive it as
perversion
> to explicitely and voluntarily register or maintain an
abuse-mailbox:
> attribute that points to a disfunct mail delivery
point...
I absolutely agree and should have made that more clear.
> [...]
>> a rehashing of the discussion from last year is
unlikely to be
>> helpful without some new input.
> [...]
>
> So, one of the ideas I am having right now - as this
attribute is
> not mandatory and pretty modern - is to develop a
slightly more
> formal procedure to apply to this attribute.
That sounds like a good start. If there is anything I can
do to
help, please let me know.
Brian.
|
