no mandatory QA testing at all

James Kosin wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi
>>
>>http:
//fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy/QATesting.
>>
>>    
>>
>OK,
>
>It is a little buried in the clutter.  I've seen this
page many times,
>but never really dig-ed into it.
>  
>
It is referred from http://fedorapro
ject.org/wiki/Legacy which has a 
link from the frontpage. How is that buried in clutter?.
What can we do 
to improve that?\

-- 
Rahul 

Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedor
aproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-
list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> It is referred from http://fedorapro
ject.org/wiki/Legacy which has a
> link from the frontpage. How is that buried in
clutter?. What can we do
> to improve that?\
> 
Don't get personal, I'm talking semantics here about not
outlining them
as steps.

ex:  The first one is named 'QASubmit'... OK maybe a
limitation of wiki
here and not someone's exact wording... but, maybe a
description saying
Package Resubmitting Procedures could be better.  Something
pointing to
the fact the page is a procedural form instead of a simple
description.

Even something like follow these steps or procedures....

James Kosin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFD8i+7kNLDmnu1kSkRAu6zAJ4874rS9Xfly2zdxapfWJecy7ObuQCf
fu8j
7Kz9ON76BJye21LktA4fJtk=
=qJij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Scanned by ClamAV - http://www.clamav.net

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-
list

James Kosin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> 
>>It is referred from http://fedorapro
ject.org/wiki/Legacy which has a
>>link from the frontpage. How is that buried in
clutter?. What can we do
>>to improve that?\
>>
> 
> Don't get personal, I'm talking semantics here about
not outlining them
> as steps.

The only way for that to be person that I can see would be
for it
to be sarcastic, and my experience with Mr. Sundaram leads
me to
believe that he was not sarcastic, but asking for help to
make
the web page better.

[snip]

Mike
-- 
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){p
rintf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for
you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-
list