nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates

On 11/30/06, Rex Dieter <rdietermath.unl.edu> wrote:
> Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last
Fedora servers
> > over to CentOS even sooner now...
>
> I take it, then, that extending Fedora's (supported)
life-cycle to 13+ mos
> isn't sufficient for your needs?
>

For my previous government jobs it took about 3 months to
get an OS
certified from the time it was gold to when it could be
used. That
leaves 10 months of usefulness of it, which I think will
work well for
the cluster people who needed the latest stuff as they will
be really
only using it for 6 months before the next upgrade. The
finalized
large cluster would go onto being Centos or RHEL as it would
need to
run the same code sets for 5 years.  Depending on the
department, a 10
month lifetime would also be ok for desktops. For servers,
it is too
short of a time as it usually takes about 2 months after the
OS is ok
to be used for the various services to be solid. However, it
is what
people get for living off the work of others (eg gratis)




-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a
good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of
Venice"

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-listredhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-
list