---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: inode0 <inode0 gmail.com>
Date: Feb 6, 2007 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [rhn-satellite-users] Recent and Upcoming RHN
Account
Policy Changes
To: rhn-users-list redhat.com, rhn-satellite-users redhat.com
On 2/6/07, Máirín Duffy <duffy redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> John and Dave were correct in their observations about
the recent RHN
> account policy changes [1] - we should announce these
changes ahead of
> time to give customers both a chance to give us some
feedback and to
> absorb these changes into their process. I apologize
that this was not
> the case.
We do appreciate any efforts you make toward including more
of us in
the feedback loop prior to rolling out policy changes of
this nature
in the future.
> The user account changes are part of a much larger
upcoming set of
> improvements in our account system across all
customer-facing services,
> not just RHN. These were initiated in part due to
customer feedback
> about how our account systems work.
>
> The single email address per account policy change in
particular is part
> of an improvement to support single sign on accounts;
right now you may
> have multiple accounts to access various Red Hat
applications such as
> RHN, the Red Hat Store, customer service & support,
Issue Tracker, etc.
> We are working to consolidate these systems under a
single account
> system so you'll only need one account to access these
different
> applications.
While this isn't a real big selling point to me personally,
having
some reason for the policy change helps me understand why
some extra
work will now be required on my end. I don't need to wonder
why in the
world are they making me do extra stuff now. If in the
future things
like this get announced prior to rolling them out I think my
feathers
wouldn't get ruffled so often.
> Another upcoming improvement related to this account
policy change is a
> multi-organizational account management.
Multi-organizational management
> will allow one Red Hat account to have 'sub-accounts.'
So, for example,
> if you've 100 purchased RHEL AS subscriptions for your
servers and 100
> RHEL WS subscriptions for your workstations, you'll
want to make sure
> that folks who should be running RHEL WS do not have
access to RHEL AS
> and cannot access subscriptions from your server group.
With these
> upcoming changes, you'll be able to split your account
into different
> 'organizations', one that only has access to a
particular set of RHEL WS
> subscriptions. Then you can create accounts in the WS
organization for
> those users who you only want to have access to those
WS subscriptions.
> Basically, this new account system will let you have
better control over
> what subscriptions and systems users in your
organization can access in RHN.
This has the potential to be a huge benefit to our
organization. But
the devil is always in the details and now that the door is
cracked
open a tiny bit here are a couple of questions to get the
ball
rolling.
Will there be administrative roles associated with a
sub-account? Can
the organization admin assign sub-account admin privs to
another
account enabling that account to control the goings on in
the
sub-account (create users/keys/groups)?
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
rhn-users mailing list
rhn-users redhat.com
htt
ps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
|