|
List Info
Thread: Re: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 10
|
|
| Re: rhn-users Digest, Vol 36, Issue 10 |

|
2007-02-12 11:14:41 |
|
Hi,
I am just installed new os.Please tell me how can i connect internet via bluetooth via mobile phone.i am also activated gprs interner service.Please help me
On 2/12/07, rhn-users-request redhat.com">rhn-users-request redhat.com < rhn-users-request redhat.com">rhn-users-request redhat.com
> wrote:
Send rhn-users mailing list submissions to rhn-users redhat.com">rhn-users redhat.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
rhn-users-request redhat.com">rhn-users-request redhat.com
You can reach the person managing the list at rhn-users-owner redhat.com">rhn-users-owner redhat.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of rhn-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers (Dag Wieers)
2. Re: Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers (inode0) 3. Re: Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers (Dag Wieers) 4. Re: Bluetooth (M?ir?n Duffy) 5. RE: Bluetooth (Dennis D. Calhoun)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 20:56:52 +0100 (CET) From: Dag Wieers < dag wieers.com">dag wieers.com>
Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com)" < rhn-users redhat.com">
rhn-users redhat.com> Message-ID: < Pine.LNX.4.64.0702112049090.1144 horsea.3ti.be">Pine.LNX.4.64.0702112049090.1144 horsea.3ti.be> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, inode0 wrote:
> While I know there is no official support for this, everyone must do > it or arrange network installs from somewhere else. We maintain > network install trees for RHEL3, RHEL4, FC5, and FC6 currently and I
> am getting tired of doing an installation and then needing to apply > hundreds of updates immediately after a fresh install. > > It doesn't seem to me that it would be that difficult to update the
> installation trees as packages are updated so a fresh install will be > current right after it finishes. I am quite capable of not > understanding why some things are problematic though. At least that
> would be a lot nicer for users who do interactive installs. > > Can someone tell me what would need to be changed in these trees? I'm > thinking some repodata mods would be required for the fedora side and
> perhaps something in the base directory on the RHEL side. And then > there is the question of how to get the updated packages from RHN to > put into the trees. mrepo is the only tool I'm vaguely aware of that
> allows grabbing such updates in a single location. It would be nice > though if Red Hat just accommodated the need for this directly.
We've discussed doing this on the mailinglist (and I have had some
conversations with people that have this on their wishlist).
One of the problems is the differences between distributions, another is the fact that mrepo starts from ISO images (and as a result are read-only
mounted) to save disk space.
What I am interested to look at is using fuse/unionfs to make the ISO-images modifiable and as a result rewrite the on-disc metadata to accomodate kickstart installations.
For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda39;s metadata and apply the correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata re-generation functionality.
Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way to
get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions and providing patches/information.
PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 allows to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an
sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will again have a different methodology 
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag wieers.com">dag wieers.com,
http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:28:26 -0600 From: inode0 <
inode0 gmail.com">inode0 gmail.com> Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (rhn.redhat.com
)" < rhn-users redhat.com">rhn-users redhat.com> Message-ID: < e8a30f560702111328q410a374fvb7291df0b6919ea1 mail.gmail.com">e8a30f560702111328q410a374fvb7291df0b6919ea1 mail.gmail.com
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 2/11/07, Dag Wieers < dag wieers.com">dag wieers.com> wrote: > We've discussed doing this on the mailinglist (and I have had some
> conversations with people that have this on their wishlist). > > One of the problems is the differences between distributions, another is > the fact that mrepo starts from ISO images (and as a result are read-only
> mounted) to save disk space. > > What I am interested to look at is using fuse/unionfs to make the > ISO-images modifiable and as a result rewrite the on-disc metadata to > accomodate kickstart installations.
While this is interesting for mrepo, my focus now is more on fixing up the anaconda metadata so installs can proceed from on-disk installation trees. That would be one step toward what mrepo would need at least.
So does anyone know of tools for doing this before I start down the "figure it out yourself" development branch?
> For this mrepo needs an understanding of anaconda39;s metadata and apply the
> correct methodology, unionfs integration and the metadata re-generation > functionality. > > Usually mrepo development is driven by effort from users. The best way to > get new features in mrepo is looking into specifics, join discussions and
> providing patches/information. > > PS Starting with RHEL5 this is really no longer necessary as RHEL5 allows > to use normal yum repositories. The fact that Yum is now moving to an > sqlite metadata format will probably mean that for FC7/RHEL6 will again
> have a different methodology 
Can you help me understand how this makes it possible? Presumably this means that I could now be doing up to date installs of FC5 and FC6 rather than what I am doing (dropping the original ISOs into an
installation tree and doing hundreds of package updates after the install completes).
Thanks, John
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:43:31 +0100 (CET)
From: Dag Wieers < dag wieers.com">dag wieers.com> Subject: Re: [rhn-users] Network Installations via RHN Proxy Servers To: "Discussions about Red Hat Network (
rhn.redhat.com)" < rhn-users redhat.com">rhn-users | |