On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:38:41PM -0400, P WR wrote:
> There are many distributed computing projects that
could use our help. And
> helping them would give us a larger variety of projects
to work on. And
> even if you don't like my idea of merging with other
projects, I definitely
> think we need more short-term projects. There are many
cool cryptography
> projects that we could compute. And they wouldn't take
hundreds of years to
> complete like RC5.
I love the thought of helping other projects out, but there
is a
down-side: there's a non-trivial amount of work involved in
adding
projects to our network. For one thing, it means new
clients, which
folks have to go and download. We'd also need to create new
cores to go
in those new clients. I believe every new project requires
an update to
the proxy code, and it certainly means new code for the
master (although
there's been some work on allowing for multiple masters that
might make
this easier). Finally there's stats, with the biggest
challenge there
being "what should I measure".
Of course, all that is just a 'simple matter of code'. It's
really just
a matter of getting it done. I don't want to rain on the
parade, but we
just don't have a lot of time being spent on code changes.
For stuff
like this to happen with any speed, it's going to take some
folks (and
by folks I mean d.net participants) stepping up to the plate
and getting
that work done.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel distributed.net
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net
Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
_______________________________________________
rc5 mailing list
rc5 lists.distributed.net
htt
p://lists.distributed.net/mailman/listinfo/rc5
|