Werner Donné wrote:
> I thought the DAV:not-supported-privilege precondition
was
> about using an unsupported element inside a
DAV:privilege
> element and therefore I would expect a more specific
> precondition.
The precondition *name* sounds like that, but the
description seems to
make it way more flexible... It seems it changed between
draft 07 and
draft 08 from...:
<DAV:supported-privilege/>: One or more of the
privileges in the ACL
request is not supported by the resource.
to:
(DAV:not-supported-privilege): The ACEs submitted in the
ACL
request MUST be supported by the resource.
Not sure whether that was intentional.
Anyway: a new precondition would give us an opportunity to
explain that
a server is not required to support
DAV:principal/DAV:property, so I am
+1 for adding this.
Any objections?
Best regards, Julian
|
