Is GeoDjango stable.

Greetings folks,

We are looking into using GeoDjango for a project of ours
and are
wondering how stable it is compared to 0.9.6? I took a look
at the
revisions and it seems to be updated from trunk, but from
my
understanding its not exactly stable? Our requirements are
very simple
as we want to record simple positions to be rendered on a
google map,
we are using postgresql and maybe just storing positions as
numbers is
a better option?

Regards,
Brent.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-usersgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at htt
p://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Generally, GeoDjango is as stable as trunk (the latest merge
was today
-- we're in sync up to r6990).  This topic was discussed
in-depth in a
previous thread:

http://groups.google.com/group/
django-users/browse_thread/thread/f6d73b6ec1be2f03

> I took a look at the revisions and it seems to be
updated from trunk, but from my
> understanding its not exactly stable?

I'm aware that GeoDjango's installation requirements are
burdensome,
however, this should not be confused with
"instability."  The current
installation situation should improve as binary packages for
GEOS 3.0
and GDAL 1.5 become more readily available.

Best Regards,
-Justin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-usersgooglegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users-unsubscribegooglegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at htt
p://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---