When I wrote 'followed by a short procedure', I indeed meant
a
simplesect containing both a title and procedure (the
procedure
following the title element). It looks like either task or
simplesect
could fit the bill.
As for which is more semantically meaningful, task seems to
have more
meaning, although for this usage, I wouldn't need any child
elements
beyond the title and procedure. An example of document
content:
To dock an existing, floating window:
1. Click the dock icon ...
To undock an existing, docked window:
1. Click the undock icon ...
I think XMLMind has been misleading me here: a procedure can
contain a
title element, so that would work as well. Perhaps task and
simplesect
are unnecessary in this case ...
Brett
On 11/28/2006 12:27 PM, Rowland, Larry wrote:
> A simplesect can indeed be a child of multiple section
ancestors. It
> merely cannot have other structural children. I am not
sure exactly
> what structure you are attempting, but a simplesect
cannot have a
> procedure following it, only simplesect, bibliography,
glossary, index
> or toc elements. It could have one as a child, but you
said you wanted
> to follow it with one (as opposed to contain one).
Another alternative
> would be to use the task element as a container of the
procedure and
> could be more semantically meaningful, depending on the
actual intent of
> your document design.
>
> Larry Rowland
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brett Leber [mailto:bleber+ cs.cmu.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 9:09 AM
> To: docbook-apps lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [docbook-apps] db5: simplesect with two
section ancestors
>
> Is it valid DocBook 5 to have a simplesect element with
two section
> ancestors (ie, section > section > simplesect)?
It seems valid to me
> from the description on docbook.org, but XMLMind
doesn't seem to allow
> this.
>
> (By the way, the rationale is that I'd like to have a
short section with
> a title such as "To do x:" followed by a
short procedure. 'Section'
> seems to overwhelm such a heading with section numbers;
and as there are
> no nested sections within, 'simplesect' seems more
semantically
> appropriate.)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brett
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help lists.oasis-open.org
|