|
List Info
Thread: XML Processing on a Mac
|
|
| XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 16:40:34 |
|
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 16:54:20 |
|
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 16:52:16 |
|
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 19:44:37 |
|
On Jan 11, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Marcel Nijenhof wrote: On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 02:59 +0000, edrubins wrote:
> > > All directories and files from /opt/tftpboot and down are
<
SPAN class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia;font-size: 13px;">> > > world readable. I know this has to be something really simple,
> > > but for the life of me I can't see what.
> >
>
> Yes I did. The only_from directive is commented out. There is none
> in the tftp script.
I assume that means the whole world has access,
> but we all know what assume means. 
I should have concluded taht from the error message which tells
that tftp isn't allowed to do something but it starts.
You tell that all directories are world readable. But this
isn't enough. The read flag on a directory means that you
may list it. You need execute permissions on the directory
to open the files in the directory.
Could you verify that all directories have execute permisions
as well.
NOTE:
I had a working setup and after "chmod 711 /opt/tftpboot" i
get the following error:
<86>Jan 11 16:32:03 xinetd[8801]: START: tftp pid=8803 from=127.0.0.1
<29>Jan 11 15:32:03 in.tftpd[8804]: RRQ from 127.0.0.1 filename pxelinux.0
<30>Jan 11 15:32:03 in.tftpd[8804]: sending NAK (0, Permission denied) to 127.0.0.1
--
marceln
.
Marce l, you're a genius! 'chmod -R go+x tftpboot' did the trick. Now my big problem is what to do with the 64 bit Suse box that's been replaced by a Mac Mini and a SLUG.
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 17:42:22 |
|
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 16:54:20 |
|
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 16:52:16 |
|
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-11 19:44:37 |
|
Yes. The other option is to download the jar and run it with a command
line argument pointing to the lucene2 jar. I would love to avoid that step.
Hook me up. (responding to list to point out second option - I prefer
this one)
- Mark
Benson Margulies wrote:
> My experience tonight is that the stock 1.9-based Luke won't open my 2.0
> indices. So I fixed up a version of the source.
>
>
>
> Anyone else want it?
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-helplucene.apache.org
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-18 07:50:18 |
Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>
>
>> Update to my own post ... Tried TextMate and was
impressed enough
>
> In what ways do you consider it is better than
emacs+nxml ?
>
>
Wouldn't say it was better per se. The original post looked
for advice
setting up a docbook toolchain on Mac OS X. TextMate,
because it's a native
OS X app, integrates nicely into that environment
("When in Rome, ...").
There are Emacs/nxml-mode features that I already miss in
TextMate, notably
the continual doc validation, either because the feature
does not exist or
I've yet to find it. For myself, I may switch back to Emacs
after a few
weeks, or I may implement the missing features, or I may
decide the
look-n-feel is more important then the feature. Dunno yet.
I do like TextMate's approach to the plugins -- it simply
execs a script
(bash, python, ruby) -- as opposed to having to write lisp.
I know Python
so that's how I've modified what TextMate calls
"Bundles". I modify my
emacs usually via Google
For the Mac OS X readers on the thread, particularly those
who are not
familiar/intimate with Emacs, it's an alternative worth
evaluating. It's
commercial software, but has a 30-day-or-something eval
period.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/XML-Processing-on-a-M
ac-tf2962313.html#a8430971
Sent from the docbook apps mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribelists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-helplists.oasis-open.org
|
|
| Re: XML Processing on a Mac |
|
2007-01-18 08:00:11 |
On 18 janv. 07, at 22:50, Cheetos wrote:
> Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>>
>>> Update to my own post ... Tried TextMate and
was impressed enough
>>
>> In what ways do you consider it is better than
emacs+nxml ?
>
> Wouldn't say it was better per se. The original post
looked for
> advice
> setting up a docbook toolchain on Mac OS X. TextMate,
because it's
> a native
> OS X app, integrates nicely into that environment
("When in
> Rome, ...").
Sorry, I did mean that with OSX in mind.
I've been looking for a relatively intuitive DocBook/XML
editor for
OSX and I've found that emacs-carbon+nxml was pretty much
everything
I needed. In fact it was the first time I could find a realy
use for
emacs on my machine. Otherwise I use more straightforward
editors à
la TextWrangler etc.
I found Qemacs which has a nice way to display the DocBook
while
editing, but it was not as practical as a "real"
emacs.
JC Helary
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribelists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-helplists.oasis-open.org
|
|
[1-10]
|
|
|
about | contact Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )
|