book / info / abstract / footnote not generated into HTML

I do have a tiny DocBook "book" here,
and my problem with it is,
that the footnote does not appear in HTML generated by the
1.72.0 stylesheets.



I tried poking my installation in order to use 1.73.0
stylesheets,
that I actually downloaded and unwrapped,
but apparently I wasn't very successfull,
as the HTML output still says, it got generated by the
1.72.0 stylesheets.
But that's another problem ...



It's not really any problem at all for me, that the footnote
does not appear,
I just thought, I should tell you here about that little
"irregularity".


I edited the text in nxml-mode, so RELAX NG does have it's
hands on it
and does consider it valid according to my
/usr/share/xml/docbook/schema/rng/5.0CR4/docbook.rnc .

Maybe it's still invalid DocBook syntax / semantics.

Maybe someone is interested in this kind of problem.

JH


<?xml version="1.0"?>

<!DOCTYPE book PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML
5.0CR4//EN" "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/5.0C
R4/dtd/docbook.dtd">

<book xmlns="http://docbook.or
g/ns/docbook" xmlnsl=&qu
ot;http://www.w3.
org/1999/xlink">

  <title>My DocBook XML test document</title>

  <info>
    <abstract>
      <para>
	paragraph of an
abstract<footnote><para>footnote ref. abstract
within info</para></footnote>
      </para>
    </abstract>
  </info>

  <chapter>
    <title>a chapter title</title>
    <para>a paragraph</para>
  </chapter>
</book>

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribelists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-helplists.oasis-open.org

Jochen+oasis-openHayek.name, 2007-07-24 21:20 +0200:

> I do have a tiny DocBook "book" here,
> and my problem with it is,
> that the footnote does not appear in HTML generated by
the 1.72.0 stylesheets.

I have not looked at this yet nor had a chance to test with
your
example document, but I think it's possible that footnote
in
abstract is ignored by design -- the rationale maybe being
that
the abstract is not always included in output.

  --Mike

Jochen+oasis-openHayek.name, 2007-07-24 21:20 +0200:

> I do have a tiny DocBook "book" here,
> and my problem with it is,
> that the footnote does not appear in HTML generated by
the 1.72.0 stylesheets.

Can you please go ahead and submit a bug report?

  htt
p://docbook.sourceforge.net/tracker/submit/bug

Just to make sure this doesn't fall between the cracks.

  --Mike

>>>>> Michael(tm) Smith writes:

> Jochen+oasis-openHayek.name, 2007-07-24 21:20 +0200:

    >> I do have a tiny DocBook "book"
here,
    >> and my problem with it is,
    >> that the footnote does not appear in HTML
generated by the 1.72.0 stylesheets.

    MS> Can you please go ahead and submit a bug report?

Sure, that's the least I can do.

    MS>   htt
p://docbook.sourceforge.net/tracker/submit/bug

Done.

Request ID: 1760907

https://
sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=176090
7&group_id=21935&atid=373747

    MS> Just to make sure this doesn't fall between the
cracks.

Thanks for your support and esp. Dick Hamilton's!!!

    MS>   --Mike

Jochen

------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribelists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-helplists.oasis-open.org